Smartphone sales down 22 percent in Q2, the worst performance in a decade::North American sales are bad for everyone, except, miraculously, Google.

  • nyoooom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair the vast majority of people don’t do that and just buy a new phone after a few years when theirs is becoming too old, has issues or lacks useful features

        • nyoooom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hopefully EU legislation should bring that back in the coming years, I believe they’re working on such law at the moment

          • variaatio@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            already enacted, vote went through in July. However the “come to force” of the earliest part of the regulation is 2025 and the replaceable battery mandate come to force date is 2027. However I would assume stuff starts going with replaceable battery 2025-2026, since by 2027 it’s illegal to not have that for on sale item. So one would transition year or two early to have ones retail and supply chains empty of the old non-replaceable stuff to avoid having unsold stock or get hit with punishment for being caught selling non regulation items*. So you want the replaceable battery products designed and in production before 2027.

            Also one key I would point out, that is often left out. It doesn’t only cover phones. It covers pretty much all battery powered electronics. SO lots of those other small electronic gadget with built in Li-ions will start sprouting battery covers or possibly moving back to their old power of choice, banks of AAs. Since those are inherently replaceable. Well plus non-recycleables aren’t covered by the regulation. However also the maker can argue their green credibility with “well customer can put rechargeable AAs in it. Then it’s a replaceable battery product.”

            * Well in reality one’s retail partners would refuse to accept the stuff for sale, since upon it being on sale at their shelf it’s now their ass on the firing line by regulators.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Planned Obsolescence / E-Waste Entropy seems to have been the main reason I upgraded to a new phone for like the last three phones I’ve owned. Eventually the phone just devours all the processing power and makes it feel bad to use, or the battery stops charging or depletes in hours even while idle.

      • danielfgom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This. The sealed phone is the #1 reason why people are getting new phones and contributing to the eco waste.

        It should have never been allowed to happen. I promise you there is a way to make a phone with a removable back waterproof. They just don’t make it because they want you to replace the phone every two years.

        They also haven’t rushed to make longer lasting batteries, say 4 years, for the same reason.

        • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t even need a hardware change to make batteries last long, capping charging at 80% and slowing the fast-charging will do that, both of which can be done in OS software. They just need a “battery protection mode” option for people who keep their phones plugged in a lot.

    • ArthurParkerhouse
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just buy refurbished or “New-Old-Stock” 2-year-old flagship phones off ebay for $100 or so bucks every other year.