• Chriskmee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where does the law say we can take it all away and require back pay when the other party didn’t break any rules?

        • Chriskmee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This doesn’t happen with financial assets though, at least not that I’ve heard of. Can you name an example of " we are going to give you a break on these taxes or fees" then that turns into “you did nothing wrong, but we are going to want those 20 years of unpaid taxes/fees that we told you that you didn’t need to pay, we changed our minds”.

            • Chriskmee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Were you not suggesting we require all the tax breaks over the last however many years be paid back in full? If not I just have been mixing you up with one of the other dozens of far left crazies I’ve been chatting with.

              If you just want to repeal tax breaks that didn’t have a guaranteed life that hasn’t been reached yet, then that’s fine I would probably agree to it depending on the side effects it might cause the middle and lower classes.

                • Chriskmee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You realize your ideas that are also being suggested by most people here are radical, right? Radical left is a thing, and this place is overflowing with it.

                  It’s one thing to suggest doing something about the cuts, but most here don’t think that’s nearly enough, proposing literal theft and preventing movement outside the country. I would argue it’s just as insane here as it is in far right circles, just a different kind of insane.