Hope @ruud is prepared for Jun 30 when RIF will go down… redditors will flood us

Are they really losing? Looking at the map it seems like they control 2x territory compared to pre-2022. And they just recently took Bakhmut.

I guess it can fit entire “Fuck Cars” community

If you are using a tank purely for moving people around then the only crew member is tank commander. Speaking of fuel, it is not like Russia has any shortage of it.

Mostly companies selling chinese garbage and unhealthy food. I guess I won’t be missing them.

This server is for everyone and we are not breaking any rules.

Totally irrelevant because:

• Russians use them mostly as tactical utility vehicles for moving personel around.
• Tank battles almost never happens in modern warfare
• Russians still have more T90s than Ukraine has Leopards and T90 is a more advanced and better protected machine

And what the entire west is going to do about it? Express deep concerns? Deliver 10 more outdated tanks to Ukraine?

I still can’t believe it will actually happen…RIF was Reddit on mobile phone for me. Killing it is like killing reddit itself. Well, yeah, good luck

Well, I guess it will work out if Switzerland manages to sell it’s CO2 emissions to other countries.

there is lemmynsfw.com for you already

To be honest, the fact that such immature software is capable of being a viable alternative to one of the biggest websites on the internet is already super impressive.

Let’s see where we will head in a couple of years.

Well it kinda makes sense given that Democrat party was what Republican is today just 30 years ago.

At publishing time, state officials in Texas were willing to discuss accepting San Francisco as a new city with the condition that it stop being super gay.

Lol. I’d put them on drug probation instead.

On a more serious note, it is maddening that the most naturally beautiful places (California, Oregon and Washington) are going down the sink thanks to liberal politics.

Didn’t smell anything in Lakewood

Also corporations are responsible for:

1. Job creation and economic growth: Corporations play a crucial role in job creation and economic growth. By investing capital and resources into various industries, corporations stimulate economic activity, generate employment opportunities, and contribute to the overall prosperity of a society. This job creation allows individuals to earn income, support their families, and improve their standard of living. While some instances of worker exploitation may exist, it is not representative of the entire corporate landscape, as many corporations prioritize fair labor practices and provide valuable employment opportunities.

2. Innovation and technological advancements: Corporations are often at the forefront of innovation and technological advancements. Through research and development efforts, corporations drive progress and create products, services, and technologies that improve people’s lives. This includes advancements in sectors such as healthcare, information technology, renewable energy, and transportation. The investments made by corporations in research and development not only contribute to societal progress but also create value by introducing new and improved products and services into the market.

3. Consumer choice and satisfaction: Corporations cater to the diverse needs and preferences of consumers by providing a wide range of products and services. This fosters competition and allows consumers to exercise their choices, resulting in improved quality, affordability, and variety of goods available in the market. By responding to consumer demands, corporations create value by fulfilling needs and enhancing the overall satisfaction of consumers.

4. Corporate social responsibility: Many corporations embrace the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and actively engage in initiatives that benefit society and the environment. These initiatives can include philanthropic activities, sustainable business practices, community development programs, and ethical sourcing. By integrating CSR into their operations, corporations demonstrate their commitment to creating social and environmental value alongside their financial objectives.

5. Positive impact on the economy: Corporations contribute to the overall growth and stability of the economy through tax payments and investments. Taxes paid by corporations help fund public services, infrastructure development, and social welfare programs. Additionally, corporations often invest in research, development, and capital projects that drive economic expansion, attract investment, and create a favorable business environment.

While it is important to acknowledge instances of exploitation or unethical practices within certain corporations, it is an oversimplification to conclude that all corporations solely thrive through exploitation and fail to create real value. Many corporations actively contribute to societal and economic progress, job creation, technological advancements, consumer satisfaction, and environmental stewardship. By recognizing and encouraging responsible business practices, it is possible to mitigate negative impacts and promote the creation of real value by corporations.

Single family houses prices are influenced by various factors, the most importantly, supply and demand. A totally alien term for the leftist. To put that in your prespective, where I live single family houses in normal condition are starting from $50,000. There is also developed public transit (for which leftist advocate), some even claim it is overbuilt, there are plenty of schools and other infrastructure, walkable neighbourhoods. But you are not coming here.

And while corporations purchasing single-family houses may contribute to increased demand, it is important to consider that housing prices are determined by a combination of factors such as population growth, housing inventory, interest rates, and local market conditions. In many areas, the demand for housing has been driven by a growing population, limited housing supply, and increased competition among buyers, which can lead to higher prices.

Another arguments are:

1. Investor activity and market efficiency. Real estate markets are typically driven by a mix of owner-occupiers and investors, including corporations. Investors play a role in providing liquidity to the market and driving economic activity. While corporations buying single-family houses may create additional competition for homebuyers, their presence does not necessarily lead to disproportionate price increases. Market forces tend to adjust prices based on the overall demand and supply, and excessive price escalation would likely discourage investment activity.

2. Government policies and regulations: housing markets are heavily influenced by government policies and regulations. Factors such as zoning laws, building codes, land use restrictions, and taxation policies can have a significant impact on housing prices. It is important to consider the role of these policies in shaping the real estate market. If prices are soaring primarily due to corporate activity, policymakers have the ability to implement measures such as tax reforms, regulations, or incentives to mitigate any potential negative effects.

3. Local market variations: Real estate markets are highly localized, and the influence of corporations buying single-family houses can vary significantly from one region to another. While there may be instances where corporate purchases have a noticeable impact on local housing prices, it is not necessarily the primary driver of high real estate prices across the entire country. Regional factors such as economic growth, job opportunities, desirability of the location, and availability of affordable housing options play a significant role in determining local market conditions and price levels.

Other factors affecting affordability: It is important to consider that housing affordability is influenced by various factors beyond corporate purchases. Factors such as income levels, lending practices, credit availability, and overall economic conditions also contribute to the affordability challenge. Focusing solely on corporate purchases overlooks the broader systemic issues that affect housing affordability and may limit the potential solutions that can be explored to address the problem.

While corporate purchases of single-family houses can impact local housing markets, it is crucial to consider a holistic view of the real estate market and acknowledge the multifaceted factors that contribute to high prices.

1. Ethical concerns and uncertainty: Gender affirming care for children involves making irreversible decisions that can have long-term physical, psychological, and social consequences. While it is important to prioritize the well-being of children, there is ongoing debate within the medical community regarding the appropriate age at which such interventions should be considered and whether they are in the best interest of the child. Some medical professionals argue that children may lack the cognitive maturity to fully comprehend the implications of such interventions and that it is necessary to approach these matters cautiously.

2. Lack of long-term research: The field of gender affirming care for children is relatively new, and there is a lack of comprehensive long-term research on the outcomes of these interventions. This means that the long-term effects, both positive and negative, of gender affirming care on children are still not fully understood. Without sufficient evidence-based data, it can be challenging to determine the best course of action and ensure that these interventions are truly beneficial and minimize harm.

3. Exploration and self-identity: Childhood and adolescence are periods of self-exploration and identity development. Some argue that it is crucial to allow children the freedom to explore and question their gender identity without prematurely committing to medical interventions. Taking a more cautious approach and providing supportive counseling, therapy, and non-permanent interventions may allow for a more holistic exploration of identity, taking into account the child’s social, emotional, and psychological well-being.

4. Ethical considerations of irreversible interventions: Gender affirming care for children often involves irreversible medical interventions such as hormone therapy or surgeries. It is essential to consider the potential impact on the child’s future well-being if they later question or regret the decision made during their youth. By waiting until the child reaches an age of greater maturity and self-awareness, they can make a more informed decision about their gender identity and weigh the potential consequences of irreversible interventions.

5. Parental rights and autonomy: Decisions regarding a child’s gender affirming care should be primarily left to the parents, as they are responsible for the well-being of their children. It is important to respect the rights of parents to make decisions they believe are in the best interest of their child, as long as the child is not being subjected to harm or neglect. By allowing a diversity of perspectives and not imposing a single medical consensus, the autonomy and decision-making power of parents can be preserved.

Medical professionals In the U.S was performing lobotomy less than 50 years ago and there was general consensus that it is beneficial within the country, but it was criticized outside, e.g in Soviet Union. Right now there is some consensus that minors can consent to sex change within the U.S mostly, but it is mostly unheard of outside. Same pattern in my opinion.

I think it is a barbaric practice which should be outlawed. Let kids be kids, they can change their bodies when they grow up.