CerebusGortok@alien.topBtoBooks@metacritics.zone•What are your thoughts about authors revising their older works to make them more modern?English
1·
1 year agoI agree with you - I censored myself from saying that part
I agree with you - I censored myself from saying that part
The author can do whatever they want. They are the artist. We can try to reject it, but to say it’s not theirs is absurd.
A lot of artist choose not to interpret their own works, which I think is valid. They don’t confirm or deny what other people get out of it. If they do want to take a stance, I think its just as valid.
A lot of writers say they don’t intentionally use symbiology in their books which a lot of people interpret. Even if they don’t do it on purpose, though it can be a subconscious thing. A Chekov’s Gun for example is foreshadowing even if it wasn’t intentional.