I didn’t hear about the vandalizing of private jets until people were complaining about stone henge. Considering they did not damage stone henge in any way this does seem like a much more effective way of bringing attention to the issue.

Don’t pretend like that’s an argument for you to not bother to read anything and ask others to spoon feed you information.

So you were downvoted for not bothering to read or even skim the article to do a minimum amount of looking on your own to see what they were talking about.

Because of what happened at Stonehenge.

juststopoil.org

The organization itself posting it on their site doesn’t mean people are hearing about it. Pretty sure the intent is to get the message to people who don’t visit their site regularly.

he must not, quote “say anything stupid” for a little while.

Did they sew his mouth shut?

They asked for a source in the comments about an article that has sources. RTFA.

There are links in the actual article being discussed here.

“I’d rather be told to ‘have a nice day’ by someone who doesn’t mean it than be told to ‘go fuck yourself’ by someone who does.”

I don’t know how any advertiser (or user) could have any faith in that platform anymore.

For the advertisers they know it’s full of rubes who will easily fall for their scams. Hence the cryptocurrencies.

Many see radicals as arrogant performers,

And when they complain about it it provides the opportunity for those supporting the cause to explain it to them.

ineffective attention grab

Seemed to grab your attention.

But I thought the point of comics was to be scientifically accurate!

It’s you’re, not your.

Oh thank God, OPs message was completely indecipherable until you translated it for us! /s

It’s also leading to discussions between those complaining about and those “already in the fold”, facilitating the spread of information.

Like the 3 private jets that were vandalized with orange paint in London.

I didn’t hear about that.

I am hearing about this.

The majority of people that heard that protest were those who travelled from around the world to see Stonehenge.

I didn’t travel to see Stonehenge and I’m hearing about it. So is everyone in this thread.

Their plans were ruined

And I see that now that the stones have been shown to be undamaged the dismissal of the protest is pivoting to “the poor people taking recreational flights have had their entire trip ruined!!!”

If people become less likely to take unnecessary flights because protestors might “ruin their trip” I would consider that an absolute win.

You can be angry about both things

And yet here you are being angry about the stones. How far back in your comment history would I have to look to find you being angry about climate change?

It doesn’t help the message

Really? Because I’m seeing it being talked about a lot.

So the meme is in agreement that defacing Stonehenge as a protest was pointless?

The meme is saying you’re getting angry about the wrong thing.