Marriage strike is cope and delusion, and it is bad framing.
(1) women do not care if men go on “Marriage strike” since there is a massive demand imbalance. Women are not interested in deselected men, if men do not meet the demands of women they get deselected.
(2) Marriage strike implies men will come crawling back to marriage if they get their demands meet. When the concept of marriage should be rejected totally, (Not that men are in any position to make demands, if they do they get deselected.)
(3) Marriage strike is posturing, since soon as men are selected, the pretence and ego defence is dropped and they come crawling back to women.
(4) Men’s rights should not be about relationships and it is bad framing. The only position should be. “no state interference in relationships, therefore no marriage.”
A lot of your demands come across as political correct and have nothing to do with the gender dynamics between men and women. Marriage is power play of women to emotionally submissive men, that is the dynamic at play, and that power imbalance has led to the current state of marriage. Since men want to get married so badly, women set the terms.
Also no marriage, no worry about adultery, the state should not care if women sleep around or not, and mate guarding is a trad con obsession. If a woman wants to slut around and screw other guys, no one is going to stop her. You are not going to get the state to enforce adultery laws, and even if you did they would be applied against men more than women, due to legal bias.
The marriage strike is a failed concept, it is mtgow tradcon cope and posturing.
deleted by creator