I got here too late, and ngl, I feel like I missed a joke I would have liked.

The Spanish implies they’re stuffed squid? Was there anything in them?

Also, I’m getting bugles vibes

Shh, don’t go ruining OPs meme by actually understanding how tax brackets work

I’m guessing the coroner doesn’t want to commit suicide next.

Please, be reasonable:

return post.Contains("Twitter") || post.Contains("elon") ?  "loser" : "cool"; 

Mine is just running stock, but depending on what you’re trying to do with it I could imagine that a few things might not be palatable to some.

1. The read only by default file system
2. It kinda nukes everything on the system on update
3. So much of how it handles the Linux side user profiles depends on there only being the default user

I got it eventually. I tend to put my nose right up to the screen to uncross my eyes enough, and slowly pull it away until it comes into focus, but the right one is harder because it’s supposed to be closer, and therefore bigger.

Cross eye is easier for me, but these are never cross eyed.

I’m having a really hard time making out the one on the right, but the one on the left definitely is.

This mindset requires a silver bullet solution to class problems before the conversation about race can start. The practical effect of this is that ideas that would make the world piecemeal better for people of color (any people of color, not just blacks) are deemed not worthy of consideration.

Similarly, because we’re talking about this argument being used to silence non-white voices, that means that there is an assumption that any pro worker solution to class problems that is dreamt up must be inherently better for people of color. Without listening to anyone who might tell you otherwise. It gets very White Man’s Burden-y.

Basically, there’re two ways to interpret the idea that race problems are class problems:

1. They’re the same, so if we only focus on one, that’ll solve the other
2. They’re the same, so if we focus on both, that’ll solve the one real problem.

The former excludes voices, and you should be mindful that it furthers the divide that those in power want. The latter is inclusive, and allows for multiple fronts against “The guy at the top”

I think your metaphor is a little more apt than you think: The complaint is that because white people are uncomfortable with talking about race, they will insist that fixing the big hole will somehow also fix the smaller hole, and therefore there’s no reason to acknowledge the small hole.

Yes, I think the point they’re getting at is that people will use the concept of uniting regardless of race as an excuse to ignore the voices of people of color. Especially because that’s a go-to argument for white people to cop out of racial conversations that make them uncomfortable. I’m tempted to believe there’s some of that sentiment in the lurkers of this thread, given what’s getting down voted.

Either this is implying that Linux users are hiding who they are to fit in, and Windows users are comfortable in their own skin, or this is just transphobic as fuck.

If it’s the former, this may be the wrong sub for you. If it’s the latter, this may be the wrong world for you.

But it would make the rich richer, which makes it a good bet. I think the only thing that would stop private companies being allowed to develop beachfront property in the strip is if it were to turn out to be less profitable.

But that’s true of all governments that aren’t really looking out for their people.

Oh, that sounds serious, what’s Ligma?

I love that no one suspects that someone going by Satan’s Maggoty Cum Fart might, secretly, be doing a bit.

That was about 30 years ago. I’m not sure why the current parties in this political era need to be beholden to the talking points of a previous political era.

You accept, must the frog

When grooming is life

Good luck with that, granddragon88

That’s a cool narrative you made up. You actually aren’t required to have your birth year in your username on most sites.