The first part is correct, mostly it isn’t “much much” higher because it is wasted performance but you could hace a 24port switch with the CPU of a 48 port switch and you could have over 50GBit internal switching bandwidth for the 24 ports.

The Second part is a bit strange for me. Probably because of the wording. When you say modem it is probably already a router because you have multiple LAN ports. A Modem normaly only supports 1 WAN and 1 LAN Port at consumer level devices.

You can have routers behind routers but unless manually configured correctly on the main router and the 2 routers WAN the 2 LAN Networks behind each router can’t reach each other, like you cant easily reach your neighbors PC unless he opens a connection to it specifically.

Whats the model number of the thing you called a Modem?

Can you extend on what you meant when you statet “which I assume would be minimum”

And without and even in some cases with expensive load balancers you cant say stuff like “use bandwidth that is left by IoT” for example. It is very random who gets more or less bandwidth of a connection when it is at full capacity. Because of the way TCP was designed in the beginning. Resiliency was much more important than fairness ;)

No switch or router does load balancing, you wont get 5 times 20mbit it will be all over the place…

Ok I guess we have to start way in front of your question to not just answer your question but give you an understanding.

First of all, what does a switch do: A switch has for example 24 ports and all ports are connected to the CPU of the switch. When a pc connected to the switch wants to reach the router to access the internet he asks the switch to really the data to the router but the switch doesn’t know where the router is so it sends on all ports „Hey are you 192.168.0.1(for example if it’s the gateway in your network config)“ then on one port the router answered „yes“ and the switch makes a note on a list that this up is on port x. So over time the switch knows who is where and what speed does the port support. Because said CPU has a bandwidth normally greater than the sum of all ports (rock a Unifi 24 port switch by chance and it had 26gbit bandwidth) it can for example connect 2 pcs transfering files with a full gigabit all while running a download from the internet router to a third pc with no problem. So as long as you don’t want to access one ressource with multiple PCs you have full speed and if you do the packets are stored in a small buffer and if it is full the PCs are told to wait a millisecond and it is transfered in a first come first serve method so everyone can get data through.

All a router does extra on top is have an extra list if he doesn’t find the receiver of the packets internally he notes the address of the PC that asked and sends the request to the wan port and when someone responds he know who to send the response internally.

Yeah, not fair to compare with my idle numbers. It’s not running because of solar Power shenanigans

WTH everyone has lower power usage with ancient equipment 🤣

What CPU is in it? And I guess my spinning drives don’t shut down all the way I have around 100W idle with an AMD 6750GE and a HBA for 6G and 12G SAS each.

Did you configure the WANs to distributed and not failover? And did you set the distribution %?

To mitigate terminal server cost I guess. And no, virtualizing windows is no solution because to be legal you need expensive open license windows licenses and software assurance on that licenses …

My guess he is talking about inter vlan traffic. That’s most commonly where bottlenecks are created. My biggest customer has over 200 vlans and 2 dual amd epic systems as firewall with 32 10gig network connections and aggregation switches in front of some of those to get the throughput. See, you need to use a router to send traffic between vlans and if you want to have granular control over the traffic you can’t just use layer 3 switches with static routes. In your case if you have 1gig from WAN into your firewall and then 1Gig to your switch via vlan trunk every traffic between vlans has to go twice through this 1Gig line instead of a direct connection through the switch. In a Home lab environment I don’t think it would make much difference but in bigger environments it gets trickier with size and vlan count

Power lines aren’t shit or good, Jesus Christ…. It can be that different parts of your installation are on different phases of the power grid. Then you have to rely on the high frequency signal to propagate over the air to the other phases. This can be improved by letting an electrician install a phase coupler. Here in Germany it would be 30€ an half an hour of the electrician