Interesting! Do you see more builds being built at the higher cap, thus attributing to the housing crisis? Thank you for taking my question seriously.
@Ookami38@sh.itjust.works’s idea of having a portion be mandated for Minimum Wage rent has some teeth.
Have you? In my city there are a wide range of sizes (flats/multi-room) in different areas (near different industry sectors) with different amenities (washer dryer hookups/pool/dog park/none) across different ages (new builds/recent/decades old).
This adds additional nuance, and I like the idea. Thank you for taking my question seriously.
What about differently sized apartments with different amenities? Sounds like this would force standardization and a race to the bottom on minimal amenities.
Funny joke, but it’s not really a trick when it’s part of an agreed to trial. There are most definitely unethical examples when a placebo was administered without it being an agreed to potentiality. However, I wouldn’t want to brand all placebos as tricks.
That’s, uh, not a flat tax, then. You figured out the better approach immediately. And I agree, simplify the tax code while keeping it progressive.
Begun, the AI Wars have
I’ve never listened to Sawbones, but that is sound advice. The movie Pi drove that point home.
All water that comes out has a hint of mustard, just as I like it.
Hello fellow McElroy fan.
Sweet! Hopefully it becomes an even bigger cult classic and they think about a third!
Time to call up Ole Djura.
Right on. Appreciate the response.
My dark cherry 2000 Chevy Malibu.
Thank you for talking online. It might not appear to be much, but it is. You’re connecting and communicating your pain. Hopefully we merry chums can take on some of the burden you feel. Keep going; this is your one shot and it doesn’t have to be noteworthy to anyone but yourself.
I get it. You’re changing their name again.
It’s a risky seach if you’re squeamish, but Harlequin disease is skin mutation(?) that leads to babies being born with cracked skin and puffy red eyes. The cracks somewhat evoke the patterning of Harlequin’s motley attire.
(P=120 ∧ T=40 ∧ ¬(P∝T))⇒(P=60 ⇒ T=40)