Well, the bulk of announcements leaves the following fifteen cases:

November - Jarkesy. This is the SEC case with three different questions that go to the heart of whether the SEC, or any administrative enforcement apparatus, is allowed to even exist - Harrington. Bankruptcy case asking whether bankruptcy courts can extinguish entirely third-party claims (a non-debtor suing another non-debtor) as part of the Chapter 11 plan and discharge

January - Relentless, and Loper Bright. Another attempt to gut or fully override Chevron. (Chevron is the case that says that when an administrative agency such as the EPA, which really means their experts, makes a determination within that agency’s authority, the courts should start from a position of deferring to that finding. Because, you know, judges aren’t scientists, economists, &c., whereas the guys working for these agencies generally are).

February - Corner Post. Statute of limitations and accrual of claims under the APA. Pretty technical. - Ohio v. EPA. Another attempt to nuke the EPA from orbit - NetChoice. This is two joined cases, where Paxton and Florida are trying to force Facebook to not be allowed to block conservatives from spreading outright lies. (Basically, are Facebook and Twitter and their ilk “the public square” and not allowed to moderate)

March - Murthy. Related to NetChoice, except addressing whether the government is allowed to even very politely and diffidently ask that dangerously untrue content, like vaccine 5G injections or drinking horse paste or shoving bleach up your rectum, be removed from the algo. - San Carlos Apache Tribe. Addresses an edge case for the Indian Health Service’s support of the various tribes.

April - Snyder. Does a bribery charge require that there be an explicit, written, signed in blood agreement to take specific actions in exchange for a specific payment to a politician or person. - Fischer. This is the J6 case asking whether “obstruction” includes things like “counting electoral votes”, or is the crime of obstruction limited only to investigations and evidence. - Grants Pass v. Johnson. Does the enforcement, against the homeless, of general laws or regulations regarding camping on public property violate the 8th amendment cruelats and unusual punishment prohibition. - Moyle. The Idaho abortion case; does the federal EMTLA statute preempt Idaho’s “YOU WILL DIE FOR YOUR RAPIST’S BABY, YOU W****” law - Trump v. US. Specifically, the Trump v. US Immunity case

That’s a lot.

The SCOTUS Blog calendar is showing only one more day for opinions, next Wednesday.

Vegas odds say that will change

The Supreme Court has already set the precedent, of course. But, if they took the case, you’d know the fix was well and truly in. It would lead to the largest balance of powers issue the country has ever seen.

All those guys he fired from the RNC had experience. Maybe Turning Point could h8re them.

if she declares it unlawful, it’d be appealed, wouldn’t it. She really has no legal grounds. It will also force an appeal to throw her off the case. But, she will succeed in further delay before another judge is assigned.

I’ve known some US Marshals. You don’t want none of them.

They’re going to dump and run to vacation.

Please back that up with enough money to more than offset Miriam Adelson

You know so far the only person killed by Hezekiah rockets was a 12 year old Bedouin girl. Rockets don’t really deliver consequences well.

Of course they’re back – would any sane person have imagined otherwise?

This wouldn’t be leaking unless there’s a motion to remove her in the works and Chief Altonaga runs a very tight ship. This almost had to come from her office.

Did they Friske that guy?

Man, Biden is trying really hard to make the FBI look unbiased with all these fake raids of Democrats!

(/snark in case it was needed)

Polls don’t predict the future. They are a photo of the time they were taken.

The Neo-Soviet Union and Lesser Korea appear to be in a competition to see who can top the ash heap of history more quickly and permanently.

Are they dangerous? Sure. At the moment.

Are they also comical in their ineptitude, backwardness, hollowness and desperation? Oh yeah.

To me these polls were NOT important because of the swing to Biden. They were important due to the swing in important issues. To 68% of those surveyed the most important issue was “the Preservation of Democracy”. This tells me that people are taking the totally insane Trump ranting seriously and all Biden really has to do is let Trump be Trump. Trump can’t win losing independents.

The Biden campaign has been running polls and focus groups for weeks, and the message has been clear: a felony conviction is a turn-off and a dealbreaker for some meaningful number of voters

Considering the source of BS, he iscooler.

Elected GOP leaders get a waiver from following them

Electric pickups don’t have the hauling capcity farmers need, and there’s no such thing as an electric tractor