What other networks?

It currently recognizes when it is told it is wrong: it is told to apologize to it’s conversation partner and to provide a different response. It doesn’t need another network to tell it right from wrong. It needs access to the previous sessions where humans gave it that information.

It needs to be retrained on the responses it receives from it’s conversation partner. It’s previous output provides context for it’s partner’s responses.

It recognizes when it is told that it is wrong. It is fed data that certain outputs often invite “you’re wrong” feedback from it’s partners, and it is instructed to minimize such feedback.

It is not (yet) developing true intelligence. It is simply learning to bias it’s responses in such a way that it’s audience doesn’t immediately call it a liar.

It’s a solveable problem. AI is currently at a stage of development equivalent to a 2-year-old, just with better grammar. Everything it is doing now is mimicry and babbling.

It needs to feed it’s own interactions right back into it’s training data. To become a better and better mimic. Eventually, the mechanism it uses to select the appropriate data to form a response will become more and more sophisticated, and it will hallucinate less and less. Eventually, it’s hallucinations will be seen as “insightful” rather than wild ass guesses.

Your target is three rungs above you on the corporate ladder. If you have more than 3 rungs below you, there is a guillotine with your name on it.

Fools are going to part with their money somehow.

This guy is going to a lot of trouble he doesn’t need to. I mean, the “non commercial” limitation is due to a law of the land. But all he has to do is convey that vehicle to a boat ramp and let it touch water from time to time. Now it is no longer a land vehicle; it is a maritime vessel, portaging overland between ports. It is now immune to the laws of the land, and the laws of the sea don’t have a “non-commercial” limitation.

You do need to remove the “private” placard from your conveyance, and affix a “maritime” placard instead. And I’d be happy to grift you sell you such a placard.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

All I’m getting is “grift me, daddy, I’m dying to be grifted. Grift me grift me grift me grift me!”

I want to take over the “Private Conveyance, Not For Commerce” license plate market. Mine, you’ll drive the car to a boat ramp, and attach the plate while the wheels are in the water. It’s no longer a land vehicle, and land-based laws do not apply. It’s now a marine vehicle, and only maritime laws apply. You’re not “driving” or “traveling” in a “car”. You’re “portaging” your “vessel” overland between sea ports.

You’ll need to log periodic visits to various “ports” (boat ramps) to maintain your maritime status. But since you aren’t bound to the laws of the land, you are free to conduct commercial activities from your vessel.

The net benefit is I get to separate fools from their money.

I thought I hated DQ burgers. Turns out I just hate ketchup, and they pour it on.

Seems like the gun ranges are coming to him. Everywhere he goes seems to become one.

Game has been over for about that long. https://xkcd.com/391/

Removed by mod

Yeah, with adequate coordination, the gorillas should prevail in a 1v3. But I think they tend to fight more like individuals than as a pack.

Gorillas don’t have much for protection. The bear has 4" of fat “armor”. The gorillas won’t be able to bite or tear flesh.

My thinking is that if the bear is able to grab one of the gorillas, it will be disabled pretty much instantly. Unless the remaining gorilla(s) can press their momentary advantage while the bear is distracted, it’s just going to rip them apart one by one.

1v4, they might have enough clout to keep the bear immobilized long enough to kill it.

Polar bears are three times the size and weight of a silverback. They could likely prevail in a 1v2 or 1v3. 1v4 would be a fair fight.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod