That’s an error I had not seen before, but I also just encountered with this specific post. I will investigate, thanks.
That’s an error I had not seen before, but I also just encountered with this specific post. I will investigate, thanks.
This error is a rate limit from the object storage provider. I did not know of this limit when I chose them, and I still have not found a way to change the limit. I will send them an e-mail. If the limit can’t be increased, one option is to pick another object storage provider, but the migration takes days.
Check in your settings whether you have disabled the visibility of bot responses. This can happen if bots replied to you and your settings are set to not see them.
Ah - does the exit node participate at all when accessing a .onion? Or is it skipped altogether?
And the HTTP header thing is very cool, I did not know about that!
I have added the header to the site and it works!
I just added the following line to the location / {} block in the https server section:
add_header Onion-Location http://mandermybrewn3sll4kptj2ubeyuiujz6felbaanzj3ympcrlykfs2id.onion/$request_uri;
In the context of tor, a domain block would apply - for example - if the exit node’s ISP blocks the domain. But if the local network implements domain blocks, this would not affect the tor browser - is this correct? Or is it also possible to block domains locally even for tor browser users?
Thank you for being alert! I have banned them instance-wide now.
Ahh, wish I could join you! But I am travelling these days. Enjoy Canvassing!
Inderdaad, ik ben ook voor die marketing gevallen.
Denk je dat mmWave binnenkort beschikbaar zal zijn? Op dit moment heb ik een sub-6 GHz 5G-router voor internet thuis. Ik ben benieuwd hoe een mmWave-router zou presteren als er een zendmast in de buurt is.
Appointed! Sorry about the hassle. I also learned about these federated community bugs just now.
This work using high-throughput combinatorial chemistry to find molecules to stop/revert aging is amazing. I have been looking it in the past few days. The authors screened 653,000 different compounds, I am very curious about how expensive this screening was.
I was not aware of DePinho but I am familiar with Schultz’s work. I thought that would get a Nobel prize for his work on non-canonical amino acids, but he hasn’t yet. I am now placing my bets, Ronald DePinho and Peter G. Schultz will win a Nobel prize.
I tried it out and it works well with only SDR++. I have edited my post to correct this, thanks!
Ah!! I over complicated things then. It wouldn’t work for me at first and I eventually converged to this apparently sub-optimal configuration. Tomorrow I will check and edit the post accordingly, thank you!
Checking back in. Still not working :(
Publishing in a more prestigious journal usually means that your work will be read by a greater number of people. The journal that a paper is published on carries weight on the CV, and it is a relevant parameter for committees reviewing a grant applicant or when evaluating an academic job applicant.
Someone who is able to fund their own research can get away with publishing to a forum, or to some of the Arxivs without submitting to a journal. But an academic that relies on grants and benefits from collaborations is much more likely to succeed in academia if they publish in academic journals. It is not necessarily that academics want to rely on publishers, but it is often a case of either you accept and adapt to the system or you don’t thrive in it.
It would be great to find an alternative that cuts the middle man altogether. It is not a simple matter to get researchers to contribute their high-quality work to a zero-prestige experimental system, nor is it be easy to establish a robust community-driven peer-review system that provides a filtering capacity similar to that of prestigious journals. I do hope some alternative system manages to get traction in the coming years.
The server admin has access to the server infrastructure. They can access the database directly, modify the code that runs lemmy, turn off the site, often has control of the domain name and makes sure it points to the server, etc. The server admin has control over the software that runs the instance and the computer it runs on. They might have an admin account too, but that is not strictly necessary.
With “site admin” I assume that you mean someone with an account that has admin privileges. Such an administrator can access the instance with an account that can see and take action on instance-wide reports, can modify the site’s side bars, create emojis, and has other admin privileges. These admin privileges live within the website itself and are determined by lemmy’s code. This admin does not automatically have access to the server nor the database.
The structure is shown in the full text:
Thank you for the feedback!
Great to hear! Thanks!
I adore the odor of those flowers 😌