• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle


  • SambarkjandtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldThe lamest countries
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    There’s literally a response just below yours, but of course taking the time to make sure you’re actually right is never a strong point for you people.

    I personally find it very funny that the pro-Palestinian go-to is that none of the offers Israel made for a 2 state solution were ‘realistic’ or ‘serious’ or ‘good faith’. No one doubts that there were offers. Tell me, in what other scenario in all of human history do the losers of a war (that they started) get to dictate the terms of their surrender?







  • You know why they aren’t doing apartheid?

    Cause they already fucking did it.

    Starting with the Farhud in June of 1941, picking up speed after 1948 and ending in 1952, the Arab nations dispossessed and expelled more than 850,000 Jews living in their countries, leaving them penniless and homeless.

    A bit difficult to practice apartheid when you’ve just kicked out the other groups entirely. The South Africans wouldn’t have had much of an apartheid state if they just rounded up and expelled their entire black population.

    Perhaps you’ve learned something today.








  • Correct, you don’t, because those are garbage disciplines based on nothing whereas economics is decidedly not. Economics is the study of constrained choice, using rigorous math to model these scenarios and applied statistics to test the models. Any 1st or 2nd year course you take in economics isn’t revealing truisms about the world - they are introducing concepts and highly simplified, abstracted models so that when you get into upper year courses and you start using extremely heavy math to make more realistic models that are serious attempts to explain actual human behavior, you’re not completely lost.

    You take at face-value that certain subsets of economists argue in favor of bank bailouts but against student loan relief is proof that they’re evil, or garbage, or bought and paid for, without even understanding the arguments. The bank bailouts were loans which the banks paid back - would you be fine with the government giving out more loans to pay off existing student loans?