I really can’t figure how someone looking at housing and think the Liberals did a good job.
No matter how bad the Conservatives were or will be doesn’t mean the Liberals are good. What policies did the Liberals have that would have been better than the general ones from left parties NDP and Green.
Liberals have done a good job governing, passing many laws and policies I support and generally making my life better.
I’m genuinely astonished this comment has so many positive votes.
One of these categories seem very out of place for a conversation about national inflation.
Some of the increase was typical of the season. Prices for cellular services, rent, travel tours and air transportation grew at a faster pace, according to the data agency.
America is ramping up their production again and it will very likely be part of the trade agreements to be supportive their endeavor which leave us once again in a rather awkward position.
I’d like to think a competent government would be able to take advantage from both the American and Chinese subsidies, but I have feeling we lose out on the cheap decent Chinese cars while finding ourselves on the losing end of a North American trade agreement.
Technically speaking we need a lot more infrastructure as whole. Housing being the most dire one.
I’m actually starting to feel like Trudeau actually thought a ahead on this one politically and really setting up Pierre to fail.
It’s my belief that the guy is trying to be so embarrassing that he sweeps this video under the rug.
I think you’re under playing how stupid John Rustad is.
“Carbon dioxide is an essential component of life on this planet. It is not a pollution and that sort of misinformation out there is just ridiculous. It’s ridiculous to do that, it doesn’t serve anybody well,” said Rustad.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/john-rustad-carbon-dioxide-pollution-1.5990021
Why waste time deleting thier comments when their entire account is just worthless rants.
Also can you remove TruckBC as a mod it’s pretty clear they don’t plan to be back on the platform anytime soon.
If you’re referring to combining units I don’t think it’ll really be practical. The 300sqft mark is on the lower end of what is technically okay for people with some heavy consideration into functional design and lifestyle. Essentially a single person who probably spends a lot of time outside.
This is a pretty good video(13:03) on the topic .
“I hope I don’t offend people, but [Premier David Eby] is a socialist. He believes very strongly in big government. … He’s also an authoritarian who does not respect democracy and local governance.”
I see a lot Conservatives on social media call people Communist when describing Socialist leaning politics. it’s kinda funny if you know any CCP living people here they have a clear bias towards supporting Conservatives.
“That is not the approach that we want to take… and so it’s not a fit for what we are thinking.”
In regards to Rustad firing the current PHO. Do people think it’s a good thing to hire Provincial Health Officer based on how they fit their ideology.
At 3:40 in the video of OP he states there are names in the unredacted report but “some names is not also there”.
I think people are reading to much into how alarmed Singh is of the report vs May. As noted in the article there will be a public inquiry with the final report well before an expected election and they’ve made amendments to include concerns found in this report.
Justice Marie-Josée Hogue is currently leading the public inquiry into foreign interference and is expected to deliver a final report at the end of the year.
Earlier this week, the Liberals supported a Bloc Quebecois motion for the foreign interference commissioner’s mandate to include the report’s allegations – though whether or not it will be included in Hogue’s probe is ultimately up to her.
Yes, the number is 66.5% of households in 2021 is occupied by the owner. Any phrasing regarding people is a loose interpretation of the statistic.
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/220921/mc-b001-eng.htm
Note(s): Proportion of all households that are owner occupied.
30% or 40% if you don’t include people who just live together with a homeowner. Honestly that doesn’t change the story much for the purpose of OP
I don’t think there’s many scenarios where 66.5% to 30-40% isn’t a substantial difference.
65% of the Canadian population are homeowners
This is StatCan’s explanation of the number you’re referring to:
.
While people somewhat loosely use that number for home owners I believe it a highly inaccurate phrasing of the statistic. The statistic is owner-occupied homes.
It’s always the homeowner boogeyman when in reality the problem comes from the government spending money wherever and not applying strict foreign home purchasing laws that keep increasing home prices.
And they’re the people who keep advocating for these governments. For the record I don’t think you can find me ever saying that homeowners or even landlords are bad people just because of those characteristic, however it’s clear our interests do not align.
pay their fair share of taxes
The fair portion is what’s up for dispute right now.
Given the backstory behind why doctors structured their assets that way I think it’s fair and also just makes a lot of the stupid talking points go away to give them a exemption. In itself I believe they should have just switched investment properties to income tax which would be a lot more politically digestible although Trudeau commented why he won’t do that a few weeks ago.
Even disregarding political context, I think her straight forward answers with specific references to the report make it hard to dispute her findings.
Most of all I really appreciate her being the only Federal party leader will to constructively progress on this issue instead of circling around the topic ad nauseam as political theater. I believe this type of politics should do well.
Full 70 minute press conference for anyone into that sort of thing Elizabeth May shares her findings of NSICOP foreign interference report – June 11, 2024
As posted yesterday. At this point news outlets is purposely just churning a specific narrative.
The Public Safety Minister insisted that federal law prevents the government from releasing further information about the people at the centre of those allegations, and he urged party leaders to instead get their own classified briefings and said Canadians should have confidence that police can investigate and lay charges when warranted.
So far, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has declined to accept a briefing, saying it would muzzle him. Instead, he says the names should be released by the government.
How is this:
The same as this:
How is it even a discussion that the Liberals did a “good” job. Can anyone actually provide anything tangible for this?