![](/static/b1604e9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemm.ee/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fdb7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
If warmongers like Obama and Kissinger can be a Nobel peace prize winner the prise has no meaning or significance
If warmongers like Obama and Kissinger can be a Nobel peace prize winner the prise has no meaning or significance
Right now they are required to follow federal law, RFMA would no longer require them to issue licenses if they choose not to. For personal or religious reasons. We will resign back to being second class citizens
In the states that tried to in the beginning stopped shortly afterwards. This law enables them to deny marriages.
The house had them and so did the Senate. But I suppose if you took 2 minutes to look it up you would know this
Allowing states to deny issuing a license if they didnt want to
Im not losing to reason, Im battling cult of personality bias.
Has there ever been a single person that democrats disagree with they didnt try to infantilize, or is the narcissism too deep?
Its all right wing news
This law had enough Republicans supporting it to bypass anything the rotating villains did. Democrats inserted poison pills in it to get republican support in order to get a good headline.
I’m not defending anyone, I’m calling out the bullshit law that’s in place. It’s the law itself that will allow discrimination when SCOTUS strikes down Obergefell. Fucking Democrats did that to us.
HRC is nothing but gatekeepers for the DNC. They are garbage.
By making it a states rights issue where individual states can refuse to issue licenses if the clerk doesn’t want to
Sycophants only need apply, it’s all they have at this point.
And when SCOTUS strikes down Obergefell and/or Loving we can see how bad Biden and Co fucked us with the Respect For Marriage Act.
Money sways politics, something we don’t have.
I don’t give a fuck about being able to get married if others are still losing their rights.
There are choices but voters are only concerned about being on the winning team.
prag·mat·ic adjective dealing with things sensibly and realistically in a way that is based on practical rather than theoretical considerations.
When they have you voting against something it’s all theoretical
There is always the no monsters in politics vote.
Clinton’s telecom act did more damage to public knowledge and information than the fairness doctrine
Unlike the inflation bomb and shitty economy we have right now? As long as there are capitalists running the show it will always be shit