Non-binary computer witch.

ネットワーク内部から来ています。

 

¡ACHTUNG!

May contain thoughts and opinions

Viewer digression is advised

http://9p.sdf.org/~bubstance/
mailto:bubstance@9p.sdf.org
openpgp4fpr:5e057c319b634f422db8267189ba712e2779375b
  • 2 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 6th, 2024

help-circle

  • bubstance@lemmy.sdf.orgOPtounixporn@lemmy.world[rio] Plan 9 is not UNIX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    As in a less mouse-driven way to move around? Or just a straight up different window manager?

    For the first, 9front has extras on top of Plan 9 – riow(1) and a /dev/kbdtap device described in rio(4) – to allow for more keyboard-driven workflows. It can make rio into a sort of mouse-driven i3/ratpoison-ish thing… kind of.

    I autostart it with rio like this:

    riow </dev/kbdtap >/dev/kbdtap |[3] mybar
    

    where mybar is a shell function that prints the status bar at the bottom of the screen. That part is used to intercept mouse clicks and turn them into commands for the audio player, zuke.







  • bubstance@lemmy.sdf.orgOPtoUnixporn@lemmy.ml[rio] Plan 9 is not UNIX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Oh sure, lots of things are “inconvenient” on Plan 9.

    Of note for most would-be users: if you rely on a modern web browser like Firefox/Chrome, forget about it. Never going to happen.

    It’s important to remember that Plan 9 is fundamentally a research operating system; it’s not really a “typical” environment by any stretch, and that stems largely from it being entirely network-based and distributed. A single Plan 9 system in isolation can only be so interesting. Using it on a laptop like this can be an entirely different set of problems.

    If you’d like some examples of things you may face:

    • booting can be slow

    • can be intimidating to set up for some of the more important features – factotum(4) and secstore(1), new users and directories under /, etc.

    • cwfs is slow

    • hjfs is really slow

    • no multi-monitor support

    • only recently did we get a filesystem that specifically aims to be crash-safe

    • poor documentation, though it’s been getting better

    • reading research papers is basically a requirement for understanding the system

    • security is not a priority

    For me, though? I genuinely don’t need much more than what’s available in the base system.


  • bubstance@lemmy.sdf.orgOPtounixporn@lemmy.world[rio] Plan 9 is not UNIX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I guess that depends on if you consider doing basically all of my day-to-day computing as doing anything “real”.

    I use it for writing, email, programming, browsing, drawing, games… pretty much everything I would do on any other machine. Anything that I can’t do directly in Plan 9 is done by accessing from Plan 9.