The problem with this is if you have any actual significant health condition.
The problem with this is if you have any actual significant health condition.
Please see my comment to OP.
Not necessarily that it’s producing none or not enough
If your body is producing “enough” then you don’t have diabetes, type 1 or 2. That’s where they are incorrect.
Not necessarily that it’s producing none or not enough
If your body is producing “enough” then you don’t have diabetes, type 1 or 2. That’s where you are incorrect.
Type 1/2 terminology came about before any understanding of the pathology. “Diabetes mellitus” specifically refers to glucosuria. Its a symptom of insulin deficiency - absolute (typical type 1) or relative (typical type 2). It’s like calling pneumonia “cough type 1” and lung cancer “cough type 2”.
When you say “not necessarily… not enough [insulin]” You managed to get wrong what diabetes is entirely - it is necessarily “not enough” insulin again whether type 1 or 2.
Regarding your question about autoimmune destruction of the pancreas- if it is happening but there is enough insulin to maintain glycemic control, then again it is not diabetes type 1 or 2. I’m not sure if there’s uniform widely accepted terminology for it but something like “pre-type 1” is reasonable for layman terms . You have to be careful though because there’s cases of folks who had an autoimmune response but it abated and they ended up not developing (type 1) diabetes.
Its better to think of diabetes as beta cell function (and insulin) +/- and autoantibodies +/-. That leads to 4 combinations, typical type 1 is -,+ and typical type 2 is +,- but the other combinations are like 10+ % of cases (mostly being +,+ as in many “typical” type 2s have some autoantibodies but still produce insulin).
Not necessarily that it’s producing none or not enough
You are confidently incorrect.
Joke is going over my head can you explain?
It is, eg lidocaine patches. It has to be injected to really do much. Not aware of any injectables that are over the counter.
The betting odds are 96% that they’ll debate. No need to sell a bridge, you stand to gain 25 to 1 if theres no debate. You are way off what the market predicts.
Its part of wada rules to which the ioc is compliant? Drug test results for these organization are often published, at least they are for my powerlifting org
SpaceX got key govt contracts early on and is the most cost competitive launcher. The comercial space program paid off tremendously for the US.
Taiwan next!
Plenty of knowledge/skill derived wealth - Eg TSMC, aerospace, software.
Nope just ran it did exactly as I said.
Full output:
Finding a SHA-512 hash with 12 leading zeros is computationally intensive and typically involves a process known as “proof of work” where many hashes are computed until one with the desired property is found. Here’s an example Python script that performs this task:
import hashlib
import itertools
def find_hash_with_leading_zeros(prefix, leading_zeros=12):
target = '0' * leading_zeros
for nonce in itertools.count():
text = prefix + str(nonce)
hash_result = hashlib.sha512(text.encode()).hexdigest()
if hash_result.startswith(target):
return text, hash_result
prefix = "your_prefix_here"
result_text, result_hash = find_hash_with_leading_zeros(prefix)
print(f"Text: {result_text}")
print(f"SHA-512 Hash: {result_hash}")
In this script:
find_hash_with_leading_zeros
function generates a hash for a string consisting of a prefix and a nonce.prefix
variable to a string of your choice.This process can take a long time because it requires computing many hashes until the condition is met.
Would you like to run this script, or do you need further assistance with something specific?
They don’t understand but they are way better than youre making them out to be. I’m pretty sure chatgpt would give you the python code for this task, run it and then time out.
That’s by intentional design choice though.
This may be helpful from a cost / gram of protein but its a bit misleading on the grams protein/ 100 g axis for beans - those are the dry bean numbers.
Game theory is a tough subject, but it would be worth it for you to study to understand how you are acting against your less preferred candidate and helping what should be your least preferred candidate (assuming your ranked choice has the republican nominee below the democratic nominee).
Keep voting for 99% … gets us to the same place
You make it seem as though your protest vote does not also get us to the same place? Many voters have shared your mentality and voted accordingly for the past 200+ years and it’s not made a difference, what makes you think this time things will change?
This guy could have gone trach/vent 60 years ago and been mobile on wheelchair.
Death to America.
Winning hearts and minds!
You can track monero? Do you have any idea what you’re talking about?