A lazy cat in human skin, an eldritch being borne of the '90s.
I’ll take an effective altruist, even though they’re quite shit, over the current lot of lizard people politicians.
Comedically evil is the correct nomenclature, I believe.
deleted by creator
I have heard irl from a few of us who moved out of the us, that they are now going out of their way to register to vote. So, that is a lot of hope, anecdotally.
Research skills are a muscle. ;)
Also, baked AF.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/1999/aug/24/spaceexploration
He was “prolific.”
I see it as a paradox. :) I don’t like calling them trees. I just call them palms.
I did and I agree with the author. You do not have to agree with us. It’s a form vs function argument. There is not a “right absolute” answer, it’s about how you approach the question.
A third excuse for pi, you say? I think it suits it.
Mmmmm, I’d say specialists would not use the broader definitions that are more colloquial in nature. Language depends on the user and their purpose/intent. Generally, trees are woody plants with secondary growth and they aren’t monocots. It’s not a hard boundary, but really depends on context.
I’d say about 69.
https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2018/06/inside-the-world-of-global-tax-havens-and-offshore-banking-damgaard
This is old data. The well of souls being hoarded is inconceivable.
https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/