How you treat them doesn’t change that they’ve lost rights expressly enumerated in the constitution.

Criminals do not keep all their constitutional rights, when they are incarcerated they are not free to move about or posses many things. Felons on probation are not allowed to associate with other felons.

The most famous tank hobbyists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqV-LyhduSM

The flip side of that coin is if there are not enough opportunities for the current population adding more people is not a good idea.

You don’t even have to go as far as calling it a Russian hoax. In April of this year, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee investigating Hunter’s laptop found no wrongdoing. Do you believe the Republican House Committee specially tasked with finding in timing evidence in his emails are also part of the hoax?

No, the Russian hoax was a false claim that the laptop and the emails were fake. No evidence of wrong doing by Joe does not change the authenticity of the laptop.

Would you rather I double-down on the wrong thing? No wait that’s what Republicans do.

You just keep changing the reason you objected to my reply, first it was asking for a source, then the source “didn’t prove shit”, then Hunter confirming emails shut you up about that, then you bounced to its not relivent, now you seem to be arguing that there is no evidence of wrong doing by Joe, which is strange as I’ve been saying that through this thread.

You’re making up an accusation I made about you.

Also you

It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none. But you’re incapable of admitting it, just like the Republicans leading the impeachment inquiry.

There’s no reason to lie.

I’m simply looking for you to directly address that this is not related to Joe and that Hunter is irrelevant. Why won’t you just state it?

Emails showing Hunter and his buddies trying to set up corrupt deals with Joe isn’t relivent? That’s certainly worth looking into.

In other words, would it be more/less/same relevance for me to post an article about some shit one of TFG’s kids may or may not have done?

Who is TFG? If TFG is an elected official and there is evidence of TFGs kids scheming to involve TFG then yes.

I didn’t dismiss your article, I said it had no proof of anything, which it didn’t. You needed to supplement that article with additional evidence to confirm it was accurate, then I stopped mentioning it, didn’t I?

It did, they had emails from Hunters laptop. You weren’t one of those idiots that believed it was a Russian hoax were you? It has been know for quite some time that the emails were authentic.

I know our threads can be hard to follow sometimes but that’s because you keep deflecting and forgetting the topic.

It’s more you bounce to new things after you’re proved wrong.

Yes, because the House can do that. 7 months into this inquiry and nothing has happened because there’s no evidence of wrongdoing.

*No evidence of wrong doing by Joe.

Further don’t speak on this event like you’re an expert you were totally unaware of the details.

So you’re aware proceedings are still going on because they haven’t been able to find any wrongdoing, yeah?

Rember my 1st post when I said Joe hasn’t been implicated… That hasn’t changed with the fact you just learned.

Who’s riled? I’m simply asking for evidence that neither you nor the house have been able to find for 7 months now. I think you’re the riled one, posturing about it like it matters in the face of 7 months of dead ends.

It looks like you forgot or are lieing again (my money is on the latter), I never claimed there was evidence of wrong doing by Joe.

Honestly I’m not even mad. It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none. But you’re incapable of admitting it, just like the Republicans leading the impeachment inquiry. Otherwise you already would’ve. You’re just deep into the sunk cost fallacy rn and flailing.

Please show me where I said there’s evidence of wrong doing by Joe? I guess this is what you’re weasling to now, it’s kind of pathetic that you have to make things up.

I haven’t once dismissed away anything you’ve provided evidence for

Also you

Hahahaha that article doesn’t have proof of shit.

There’s no reason to lie about things.

I’m simply asking you why you give enough of a shit to follow Hunter at all and discuss him on a Political community

There was an impeachment inquiry into Joe based in part by the content of Hunter’s laptop. Instead of choosing to be ignorant on the matter I followed the proceedings. I responded because I knew my 100% factual statement correcting the liberal narrative would rile up you and your comrades.

I don’t give a single fuck what Hunter Biden does or doesn’t do, because he is not relevant in society.

Then why ask for sources showing his wrong doing and dispute those sources?

I’m simply being consistent. Sorry if that’s difficult for you to handle.

You disputed my original statement I’m just to verifying you didn’t know what you’re talking about when you disputed it.

More projection, I’m asking you for your reason as to why Hunter is even relevant, not why should I care, I’ll answer yours. I dont have some nonsense gotcha that I’m clutching to.

Replace care with relevant.

Relevance is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s relevant. Further your threshold for relevance is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.

Better?

Even though you still haven’t answered my question. If Hunter is not relevant then why are you so invested. I’ll answer yours I don’t have some nonsense gotcha.

So why do you care enough to comment here at all?

As I’ve stated before shooting down all your ridiculous claims is entertainment. You make turd time fun.

When have I been dishonest? Please provide examples.

• You claimed I stated there were good white supremists. Below is your lie.

You claim there are good white supremacists.

• You’ve claimed I was gaslightning you and then in your very next reply claimed you never stated I was making things up. One of those is a lie.

Again, I’m not asking why should I care, but why Hunter is relevant

I don’t know why he’s relevant to you and I don’t care to find out why, I just know he is.

If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have asked for sources for his emails. If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have disputed those sources. It wasn’t until your 5th reply after sources were provided that you shifted to why is this relevant.

I’m trying to establish a base line and work from there but you’re so caught up in your little question, thinking you have some gotcha, you can’t respond to anything else.

So here’s the response to your question of why you should care about Hunter, even though your actions show you do.

Caring about something is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s worthy of you caring. Further you caring is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.

I’ll take that as you don’t dispute anything in my original statement.

Once again you are asking for proof of something I never claimed to be true because you can’t find fault with my original statement.

Not a surprise you have nothing meaningful to say.

What from my original statement do you disagree with?

Just keep making up lies, it’s all you got. We both know there was nothing incorrect about my original statement.

Still cant back up your claims, and as any liar does when caught double down. Just keep trying to squirm, it doesn’t help, but it’s very entertaining.

This you?

“Yes the laptop does not contain communication between Hunter and Joe discussing corrupt deals. It does contain details of Hunter making corrupt deals that Hunter claims Joe was party to.”

Are you agreeing that I never claimed that Joe was implicated by the emails? I just want to make sure you’re not confused again.

I’m not asking you to prove this, I’m asking what the point is of even giving this story attention if Joe isn’t complicit.

I’ll answer your question with a question. Why are you giving this story attention if Joe isn’t complicit?

why you believe there are “good” white supremacists

That is an outright lie I never made that claim. You had ample opportunities to provide the quote but you never did.

your M.O. seems to just be to insult the other person and hyperfixate on the wrong aspect of a discussion while simultaneously being pretty fuckin rude to anyone that doesn’t give you a pass.

Did you ever think it might be because you make false claims about me that I’m rude to you?

HAHAHAHA you still don’t get it.

None of what you provided, even Hunter’s transcripts, implicates Joe in anything. You have yet to directly address this, meaning there’s nothing for me to respond to.

Your back to this lie, I never claimed Joe was implicated by the emails. In my very first response I said there was no evidence that he was involved. I have no idea what mental defect you posses that causes you to be unable to understand this.

Once again, Hunter is not relevant to anything political or conservative in any way, so there’s no point in saying anymore on him.

If that’s true then why do you keep responding? Why were you so triggered by me saying hunters emails had more than drug and dick picks?

I asked first, for a source, the one you provided was shit and I already explained why.

Unless you have another, I must conclude your original statement was made without proper citation, and was therefore invalid and not even worth going further.

I did provide another source, Hunter himself who, under oath, confirmed those emails are real. You really need to take a little time to read people’s replies and understand them. It’s ok if you need to reread everything some people need extra time to understand everything.

Still afraid to answer my question I see.

Testosterone also increases red blood cell count, so even male endurance athletes have an advantage. Look at Tigst Assefa who holds the women’s World record for a marathon at 2:11, she’s 120 lbs, the top 5 male marathon runners are all at 120 lbs too and run 10 minutes faster.

Even then there will still be physical differences. Higher testosterone levels increase the strength of individual muscle fibers and cause the body to produce more red blood cells. Muscle in males is stronger per pound and fed more oxygen.