Piracy it is then.

Money talks baby!

418 Put the kettle on

sigh

Not everything on the internet is meant to be taken seriously 🙄.

Honestly not sure what’s wrong with water.

Unless you live in Flint?

I see an article but I don’t see anywhere to “check” what am I doing wrong? Loading this on mobile Firefox for context.

Edit: it was the ad blocker. All good now. Labour hold.

What would be your “back pocket wish”?

That nobody is guilt tripped into making wishes on their birthday to satisfy social norms.

Check mate atheists.

Freedom of goods, freedom of services, freedom of capital, freedom of movement, and freedom of reading all of your private messages (excluding EU officials, naturally).

Expand GDS

US multinationals reaching for their check books…

Because when a child wants the attention that you’re not giving, it shits on your kitchen floor so that you have to pay attention.

Thrown out of the Labour party for fighting for the rights of the many not the few. Resurrected three days later as an independent. Initials JC.

Need I say more?

You kick my dog and now he need operation!

They could slash that in half and it would still be too expensive. What a collosal waste of money. Absolutely brain dead pricing for fans.

They don’t work for everyone. I know quite a few friends that have just eaten cold turkey and quit.

I think the problem is mostly in the naming. It’s less of an equaliser in the maths sense but more of a wibbly-wobbly-thinger.

Sir, this is the internet. There is no room for this kind of thinking. I’ll kindly ask you to pick up your pitchfork and join the back on the line.

Reform UK plans ‘don’t add up’ and costings are out ‘by tens of billions of pounds per year’, says IFS

Sounds like he’s on track to be the next PM then.

🤭

Yeah that’s all fine and good. I just thought it was odd that they don’t mention this. I’m not sure why they didn’t. But I only spent a few minutes looking at the article, it was just something that crossed my mind. Usually this a big red flag when talking about and presenting data, that’s all.

A selection of the data is in the article.

What’s their methodology, what’s their assumptions, what’s their references? If you want to look credible and trustworthy in your analysis you should provide links to this sort of information. Otherwise you might be accused of misinformation.

I’m not saying either way, but I am asking where this can be found. I don’t think that’s unreasonable, right?

Am I missing something or does this article not provide a link to the study? Red flag there.