• 0 Posts
  • 183 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 9th, 2023

help-circle

  • odelik@lemmy.todaytoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldNot Likeable
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I mean, technically, that’s a conspiracy. It’s just not a conspiracy “theory” like the faked moon landing, Area 51 &aliens, etc etc. It’s just the regular, boring, type of conspiracy. And it was perfectly legal,very legal, the legalest, and legalsideboob (thanks autocomplete for this one. )






  • odelik@lemmy.todaytomoviesFuturistic movies timeline
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    This is a diverging bar chart sorted by the date in which the film was supposed to take place.

    The vertical line on 2000 represents the “Distant Future, a new millennium” that a lot of sci-fi and dystopia media looked at in the past.

    The left side of that bar represents the ~year the film was produced in our reality. This chart would make more sense if they included the production/release year of the film instead of an approximation on the condensed scale.

    The right side of the bar represents the year that the film takes place.







    1. OP mentioned this also happened outside in the parking lot and was implying active blocking.

    2. There’s ways for stores to work with telecoms to get service broadcast inside the warehouse/building as well to get around the natural passive blocking from the building materials.

    I was well aware of the difference between active and passive blocking.



  • odelik@lemmy.todaytoMildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldFrack you, Walmart
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    This is more likely a coverage issue than Walmart illegally blocking wireless signals (per to FCC regulations).

    Report the coverage issue to Verizon and your local Walmart. Both of which will want to increase coverage of where people are gathering. This is because if bad coverage areas are in places where people gather this will cause affected people to switch services or stop going to those gathering areas if there’s alternatives.


  • odelik@lemmy.todaytoMemes@lemmy.mlts moment
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    You’re right. Had to dig into my memory for this one and fact check myself.

    IRC, BBS, and most forums (of the era) used PM or SP. MUCKs and a few other tools used Whisper. ICQ introduced “IM me”. Part of me remebers using the term “DM” for IRC messages, but I used IRC fairly regularly well into the 2010s.

    However, the forum I spent a ton of my younger years on used “Direct Messages” which has likely polluted my memory. Since it was a technology related forum, that was probabaly a customization from the operator to distance everyone from the idea of “private” since everything was clear-text and unencrypted back then. That or I’m confusing “IM me” from the ICQ/AIM/MSN days.

    Point being, nobody thought “PM” meant secure and not visible to the server operators back then. It just meant that only you, the recipient, server operators, and 1337 h4xx0rz could see your messages.

    What a trip down edited memory lane that was. Thanks for fact checking me.


  • odelik@lemmy.todaytoMemes@lemmy.mlts moment
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Umm… People have been using the phrase “Direct message (DM) me” since forever in the game and online comms world. Private message wasn’t a concept until after DMs were later encrypted. And we always knew, that if we didn’t control the servers, even encrypted, those messages were subject the server operators.

    Your logic is giving me the impression that you’re younger and didn’t go through these experiences.