Husband, Father, IT Pro, service.

I ask a lot of questions to try to understand how people think.

  • 34 Posts
  • 394 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 11th, 2024

help-circle



  • It’s pretty plain to see IBM afraid of loosing vendor lock-in, but running a software solution designed for an open or distributed platform shouldn’t be that big of a threat, right?

    All their selling points for z series are the insane hardware performance, redundancy, and tuning.

    Isn’t it unlikely you’re going to get that on some virtual or abstracted mainframe platform?

    If I was one of the businesses that’s been paying the fortune keeping IBM mainframe alive, I’d stay on it. They measure profits in the billions and saving some money going away from IBM and risking loosing countless dollars per minute seems like a risk…

    Oh wait, I forgot, all American Corps are currently (since the 80s-ish), worthless greedy fucks solely focused on short term profit and stock price regardless of long term consequences. Maybe they should save some money on one of the things that’s helps make them billions…I bet that golden goose tastes amazing 😄












  • Thanks for the insight.

    It’s a shame we still can all just get along. That saying is lame, but it’s ultimately the goal.

    One of my ideas, that isn’t terribly realistic or shouldn’t have to be resorted to, is to locate our selves in regions that are more welcoming.

    There was a person at my work who was lesbian, which I suspected, but they weren’t open. One day at a social event, they brought their wife and brother (for support) and made public. I was stupid and didn’t put all that together until then.

    They moved to Washington State and both have great jobs now. I felt like part of that move was related to moving to a region known to support their life style more welcomingly, at least compared to Indiana.

    You shouldn’t have to do that, but if I could stack enough chips to afford doing that and needed to, I would.

    I said above that you shouldn’t have to do that ever. No one should be treated like shit by whole groups of people, political, religious or other wise.

    I like the idea of states competing for talent and opportunity. Washington also tried decriminalization of all drugs. Lots of people nay sayed. I thought it was great. They tried an experiment instead of just listening to a bunch of wind bags. That didn’t work as it was implemented, but we all got real world data, and identified other failures of legislation that went beyond just drugs (treatment, transportation issues, logistics, funding,.etc). I might be all talk though, I would not want to conduct that here.

    Weed is the same way. All the states doing it are eventually going to have eliminated all excuses for now allowing it. Some states still might never. That’s ok. People can shuffle around based on what’s important to them.

    You shouldn’t ever have to be subjected to mistreatment just for who you are though, anywhere in America.

    I hate both our parties, most of all politicians, and a large majority of our policies in their current form. There’s no one for me to vote for, and no national pride in what they do or represent.




  • RedFox@infosec.pubtoIndiana@midwest.socialAnother eclipse photo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I enjoyed the weird feeling when all the traffic was very scarce, and even though stores and shops were open, everything seemed to stop for 30 minutes as everyone stood outside.

    It was like capitalism took a 20 minute break, and I wish we could do that more often. Not a ton, just a little


  • Are all Republicans the ‘same’ I your opinion?

    I often want to think that people can be conservative and like some Republican ideas, but without the stereotypical bigotry stuff.

    Personally now, I think that’s less and less possible, but part of why I’m asking.

    I feel like I’m running into less barely Republican people, and more very Republican people. I guess by that, I mean people whom are more accepting or believing that their policies are right (being very opposed to immigration, accepting LGBTQ, pro corporate, etc).

    I like the Midwest, and dislike the East Coast look and feel. I haven’t been on the West Coast enough to form a meaningful opinion.

    I also don’t qualify for discrimination targeting. Most of the corruption I’m surrounded by seems to relate more to socioeconomics and greedy politicians than people who care about someone’s color/etc, but again, maybe naive…



  • one of the marginalized groups

    You’re a double or triple then…:)

    the people who elect these bigots know exactly what they stand for, and they support it. South Dakota has a really problematic history But anyone who supports Republicans here knows exactly what they’re getting

    Do you think that is a majority, or just a powerful/extreme small group?

    I don’t know anything about SD, so I’ll have to google what you’re talking about.

    I can’t legitimize their worldview by having anything to do with them beyond what my work requires

    I can relate to this in a small way. I’m probably way more conservative then most average/stereotype lemmy users, but I find that the view points of people I work with are far more extreme/right than mine. I’m maybe barely right, or right in some things, and left in others? Who cares. I just cannot for the life of me see how they can only view things/people from one side. When they rant about left/D things, I point out the same things about right/R things, it’s like they lose their minds. It’s all fake news and brainwashing, but they don’t see the hypocrisy in anyway. I have no idea how.

    I am still hoping the whole region isn’t as bad as I’m led to believe. That’s the reason some of your view points are helpful.



  • I tend to agree with the nice and kind part of Midwest, with exception that it seems like we’re becoming more hard-line against things people call woke or alternate life styles.

    I’m using a universal ‘we’ since, and I think you’re right - there’s a difference between urban city thinking and rural community thinking.

    I have a whole theory about the city thinking and rural thinking having to due with ownership or property, but that’s a whole other thing…