Going back doesn’t change much, people will still not like referees decisions and they will still cost teams dearly.

That’s one of the main reasons that I want to scrap or drastically reduce the use of VAR though. No matter what, football officiating is somewhat subjective and is done by fallible humans. No matter if it’s happening on the field or in a VAR booth, it’s still subjective humans making the decision, and some will still be wrong or be perceived as wrong by many fans.

VAR comes with very real drawbacks - long stoppages of play, not being able to get caught up in the moment and celebrate goals, not knowing what is going on as a fan in the stadium. If it truly led to better officiating and less controversy, then I think it would be worth having a discussion around if the benefits outweighed the costs. As things stand, I think we’re getting the worst of both worlds, and I don’t see VAR improving enough to make that not the case.

I think pro VAR people think that there is some magic tweak to the system that will allow us to have consistently perfect decisions, but I just don’t think that goal is realistic. The inherent subjectivity of calls is always going to leave room for controversy.

The double digit stoppage times and super-long VAR stoppages we are seeing this year might have something to do with it.

Farce of a call. Handball clear as day.