That makes more sense.

That is more defined of an answer. It would be great to see a reliable method of being able to share games with other users.

I feel like if they would have put Choice 1, Choice 2 or 1st Choice, 2nd Choice it might have gone over better.

I mean, it’s not like it doesn’t make sense how it is, but it could have been simplified even further. Some people apparently need that.

Could have easily been written that way on purpose also to discourage people from using it.

I mean it’s just like asking a kid what they want for Christmas. If you ask them to give you a list they will probably let you know exactly which ones they want the most. It’s really not that difficult but people often overthink these things and this is what you end up with.

Same, I’ve always just rounded up. Even when it comes to things like .50¢ I still just round it up to the next dollar.

Giveaways should not be banned.

It could help to bring more people to your community.

It would be better to have a very simple couple of rules.

No posting the codes outright. Simple mechanic for giving the code out like guess the number, or first to comment. State the source (Steam, GOG, Epic)

Like literally all you need, and yes I’m salty because I was literally just trying to give away a game because I have a code for something that is already in my library.

Don’t ban things that are beneficial to others. “We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.” is not a valid enough reason to ban giveaways. Someone is offering something up, if they don’t commit, then ban them, not the practice of generosity.

Edit: added a comma

Totally fair point.

For anyone that’s interested since someone covered up the QR code for seemingly no reason.

https://on.soundcloud.com/Na3sMXvkdxzFZVsK8

This is exactly what happens when the system is based on lowest bid contracts.

They should, but they are in on the take so they won’t.

They are trying to “save face” by shit talking while refusing to show any true evidence that their product does not impact performance.

People are tired of it so they stop buying games that have Denuvo. Denuvo needs to look like a sound investment, but it’s bleeding out because it really isn’t, and companies are likely losing more than they are actually gaining via sales because of Denuvo, thus some companies are distancing themselves and Denuvo is losing money.

deleted by creator

I was unaware that there are were two from that time period.

There’s another one in Okinawa which is now known as Peace Prayer (or Memorial) Park.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okinawa_Prefectural_Peace_Memorial_Museum

This is pretty helpful to put things into perspective.

I’ve been over here scratching my head at why I’m having problems with ray tracing and I forget that I’m running 2k on a 21:9 monitor.

To be fair though I can run both Doom Eternal and Control maxed out in 2k and I get consistently high frame rates with no issues. Anything else is a toss up though.

Maybe I’ll try dropping down to 1080 and see how that goes.

7800xt

32GB DDR4 3200

Ryzen 9 3900x

Arch Linux

Lego is partnering up with F1 so that checks out.

And OPs “Pstpstpst” requires too much enunciation. Pspsps is where it’s at.

Yup, that’s it!

I figured it out.

I was already headed the right direction by using something like this…

<button text=“Hold Enter” ontap=“enterhold” ondoubletap=“enterrelease” />

But for whatever reason it seems to ignore a double tap to release it, maybe I’m just too slow on tapping lol. I changed it to onhold=“enterrelease” and it works like intended.

I believe so.

Came back just to see if you had posted a video link somewhere else.

I appreciate your response here. That is an entirely fair point. Especially considering how the people in the internet will very quickly jump on a hate train and harass someone.

Maybe post the video link?

Coulda just flew to Oregon for that one lol. You can catch them up on haystack rock.

I bet it was still an awesome experience you had none the less.