• @Kusimulkku
    link
    -23 months ago

    I really don’t see how this is enshittification or anti-consumer. Nothing about your use of or experience of VLC changes if you simply don’t use FAST streams. To me this seems similar to whether or not to ship patent encumbered codecs.

    • @BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      What if Disney wanted to integrate their own DRM support into the Linux Kernel so you could watch Disney Blu-Ray movies? Would you accept the “you don’t have to watch Disney movies” justification?

      • @Kusimulkku
        link
        -43 months ago

        I’d be fine with VLC having a way to watch proprietary Blu-Rays. I think it has that feature and it does seem useful for those who want to watch Disney Blu-Rays. VLC is supposed to be pretty much a swiss army knife of media players, after all.

        If you wanted to compare to the kernel then best comparison would be to something like proprietary drivers or something.

        • @BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          We had to fight corporations for the right to decode DVDs and Blu-rays with FOSS software. This has been a major part of the software freedom movement. I don’t want to see a deviation away from principles.

          • @Kusimulkku
            link
            03 months ago

            There’s room for both the principled take and the practicality. We have both FOSS distros and those that ship patent encumbered stuff and proprietary driver.

              • @Kusimulkku
                link
                03 months ago

                VLC has been distributed with libdvdcss and patent incumbered codecs for ages.

                Beware: VLC media player binaries are distributed with the libdvdcss library included.

                I don’t see this as at all different tbh