• EatATaco
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Doesn’t the fact that you recognize the law varies from state to state kind of disprove your claim of “universal understanding”?

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      1: Tell me more about how you want to fuck teenagers

      2: It’s very clearly a hypothetical being advanced to make the reader consider exactly that the belief isn’t universal

      • EatATaco
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I won’t lie. I see plenty of underage women that I find physically attractive. I find it hard to believe any man has never seen a minor that they find physically attractive. However, there are few I find intellectually or emotionally attractive… and precisely zero I would actually have sex with.

        I don’t see what that has to do with the law or your claim it’s universally accepted that having sex with someone under 18 is rape.

        I don’t follow point 2. The only way I can interpret it is that you are saying your point was actually the opposite of your point.