TLDR: a county that has a mosque that had several 9/11 terrorists as well as the Fort Hood terrorist is letting kids skip the Holocaust lesson. All democrat board too.

What the actual fuck.

  • NeuromancerM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    The Oct 7th attacks killed 1200+ Israelies or thereabouts. If that’s genocide, then what is the 30K, many of whom are killed at sites of aid? Where is the self-defense in getting killing starving people?

    That blood is on Hamas. Israel is dismantling Hamas they choose to fight in the middle of their people. They choose to hide with civilians.

    The right has since reintroduced and cozied up to anti-Semitism by embracing Donald Trump.

    Trump isn’t anti-Semitic. It’s why he was popular in Israel. His daughter is a Jew.

    • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That blood is on Hamas.

      Can you explain this? I hear this from Israel genocide supporters a lot. And it’s like Israel’s hands are tied, as if they’re required to murder civilian en masse because they’re at war with Hamas. So, how are Israel’s actions caused by Hamas as if Israel doesn’t have choices?

      • NeuromancerM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hamas is still attacking Israel. Under international law they have the right to self defense. Hiding in civilians doesn’t mean Israel loses the right to self defense.

        Hamas could stop this at anytime but they refuse. As such the blood is on their hands.

        • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Hamas is still attacking Israel.

          Mkay.

          Under international law they have the right to self defense.

          Okey dokey. Got it. Though, my minor quibble is how it’s self-defense to go into another’s territory and fuck it up. I guess we’re using the U.S. definition of self-defense which is just aggression. Anyway, continuing the argument…

          Hiding in civilians doesn’t mean Israel loses the right to self defense.

          Wait a second…you skipped a lot of steps.

          • Implied premise: Hamas is hiding among civilians

          Okay, yeah, I’ve heard that before. Sure.

          • Implied premise: Because Hamas hides among civilians, combatants and civilians are indistinguishable.

          This premise or something like that must be perceived to be true to justify killing civilians. And it’s the critical premise in your argument.

          Implied Premise: Israeli self-defense targets civilians and Hamas combatants alike.

          But Israel is bombing sites of aid! People are just trying to survive and Israel is like, “Welp, looks like the children of Hamas need to die.” And then massacres them. These people aren’t attacking Israel as they clamor for a piece of lettuce. What is the genocidal country of Israel defending against as it destroys food and water and the people trying to get them?

          • NeuromancerM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            Though, my minor quibble is how it’s self-defense to go into another’s territory and fuck it up

            International law allows you to do this. How else would you stop the rocket attacks unless you go to destroy the rockets ?

            This premise or something like that must be perceived to be true to justify killing civilians

            It’s backed by the rules of warfare.

            Now the starving part is where I draw the line. Israel has an obligation to keep support services going to the best of their ability.

            I feel this has gone on to long. 60 days and I would have been cool. We are well past that point. They need to wrap things up and call it a day.

            • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              An obvious question is does international law concerning war have anything to say about not killing civilians? Can you go get the rockets and just…murder everyone in your path?

              • NeuromancerM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                4 months ago

                That isn’t what Israel is doing. Israel goes to extensive paths to minimize.casualties. They go above and beyond to limit the amount of people killed.

                Hamas goes out of their way to maximize civilian deaths.

                The two are not the same.