• melpomenesclevage
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Theres this tendency to completely ignore the effects of peer pressure and habituation and culture and very scary men with guns pointing them at you in these arguments, and its deeply bullshit.

    We tend to treat a hyper-competitive hyper-alienating authoritarian context as some sort of fundamental trait of humanity, rather than some shit we work very very hard to maintain.

    And its nonsense? And I can prove it. I prefer deliberate rhizomatoc organization; its more efficient long term, but I can prove spontaneous organizing happens anywhere it isnt actively shut down, and I’ll show you, in a totally non-ideological context: go to any beach, and dig a hole. Just pick a spot and start digging. Watch what happens. Nothings wrong, nobody’s in trouble, its not even really for anything, and you’ll have more help than you can use.

    I could theorize why (being on a team feels good. Doing things is a primal joy. People generally want things to get done, etc) but the fact is; it happens, and tryimg to find reasons why it can’t be the basis of a social order, or at least disaster response; seems very unnecessarily pessimistic.

    anything big enough just stops working and you need a charismatic authority figure to be in charge

    That’s a failure if your organizing systems. Read more (managerial and information) theory? Seriously though; hierarchal systems do not scale. Spontaneous horizontal systems don’t either, but you do realize there are deliberate horizontal systems, right? That you can apply going in or retrofit to an existing organization?

    representative democracy seems to work if its set up right

    Real representative democracy has never been tried? No true Scotsman? Because I’m not seeing one, and if you are, you need (new) glasses.

    hopefully its here to stay

    Oh honey. I… Maybe some acid would help this go down easier. I’m here for a hug if you need it.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And its nonsense? And I can prove it. I prefer deliberate rhizomatoc organization; its more efficient long term, but I can prove spontaneous organizing happens anywhere it isnt actively shut down, and I’ll show you, in a totally non-ideological context: go to any beach, and dig a hole. Just pick a spot and start digging. Watch what happens. Nothings wrong, nobody’s in trouble, its not even really for anything, and you’ll have more help than you can use.

      Well, it’s an interesting point. I’ve had an anarchist point out democracy was ridiculous until very recently, too. That all my lived experience and every documented sustained system is down to invisible training, and that it has no ontological momentum is an extraordinary claim, though. I need more than holes to support it; I don’t even live near a beach.

      anything big enough just stops working and you need a charismatic authority figure to be in charge

      No, just someone who’s willing to double-volunteer. It’s often me, and I have the charisma of a half-cooked noodle. I’m okay over text at least. I’m not thinking of the splashy figurehead positions.

      Maybe the politicians I sometimes work with count, but honestly they just seem like normal salespeople, and I think a few of them even know what they are. In the end, nobody is in control of the big picture.

      That’s a failure of your organizing systems. Read more (managerial and information) theory?

      I’m good on information theory. No offense, but managerial theory seems like complete circlejerk. I don’t know, do you have an example of a big horizontal organisation that does things in meatspace? I’ve seen a couple that say that, but then you realise they have one guy that’s there “just to assist” or whatever, and you need that guy to sign off on use of any resources. As a peer, of course. /s

      Because I’m not seeing one, and if you are, you need (new) glasses.

      Well, it’s certainly not direct democracy, the voters have no clue. But on the other hand, casual bribery isn’t really a thing anymore in long-established democracies. Open corruption is bad for re-election, you see.

      • melpomenesclevage
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        some shit someone else said, democracy is bad

        Democracy is great! Democracy is not made of elections. Elections (not voting. Elections. Though majority fptp elections are pretty undemocratic) are anti Democratic. Democracy can only happen when people are involved. Like actually involved. If you want more than holes; read the damn book I recommended. It goes over this at book length.

        you need that guy to sign off on resources

        See, that can be a thing that happens, because that’s how people know how to do things; the familiar form they defaukt to even if they know it sucks. But also, I feel like its often a legal requirement in the strictly hierarchalist systems we inhabit. Move to something that cares less about laws, and you’ll see less of that.

        big horizontal organization

        They tend to be pretty secretive, because when they’re not the cops murder them or arrest them for terrorism. See: ‘food not bombs’. Show me a big hierarchal organization that isn’t a recursive circle jerk shit show completely alienated from its original stated purpose used to pump up the egos and bank accounts of a fistful of kleptocrats who have barely any idea what the fuck their organization was supposed to be actually doing in the first place.

        nobody is in control

        That’s kind of my point. When you try to get all the information through a few choke points (which individuals become) you have to reduce it massively until its useless, you have to reduce the considerations that go into decisions until they’re barely (or just not) better than random, made entirely for reasons of the decision system and not at all for reasons to do with facts on the ground. The power they weild ceases to be a power to help; in that structure it literally can’t be-every form of action besides violence requires at least some understanding, and the bandwidth just isnt there, and even if it was the data has been compressed and attenuated to nonsense by the time it gets to the big man. But its still power, and its still there, and it inevitably maps to the interests of the people who believe they should be in control, which means flattening the territory to match the map, which means culling the (human) outliers. So you cede all your autonomy to a hierarchy, which then loses the power to help you, and uses everything you gave it to have some white supremacist covered in military surplus shit kick down your door, shoot your dog, and lock you in a cage for feeding hungry people. They’re not actually in control, its a fantasy built on a mountain off terrorism, but it exists.

        a circlejerk

        Some of it is. But the scientific stuff is interesting, studies communication and decision making. People talking about this stuff without a knowledge of that, or a broad knowledge of history and political theory, come off as ignorant as fuck. If you haven’t studied human coordination, even casually, why spout off about your opinions?

        casual bribery isn’t a thing in long established democracies

        So… Gimme an example of what you mean by ‘long established’ because I’m under the united states right now, and, uh…

        open corruption is bad for re election

        Okay so youre just imagining a fantasy world based on ‘should’, and there’s no danger of you ever actually looking outside without a blindfold.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Democracy is not made of elections.

          Okay, I’ll start saying elections for whatever remains of this conversation. I’m not convinced ordinary people actually taking interest in groundwater allowances far away could ever happen, which is what it sounds like you’re talking about.

          If you want more than holes; read the damn book I recommended. It goes over this at book length.

          I’ll put it on the reading list. My expectations are low though, TBH.

          I didn’t understand what you meant by casual (we’re paraphrasing, I see)

          If you get arrested, you can’t just slip the cop a hundred and leave. In many countries, that’s almost always an option, to the point they’ll just straight up tell you they want a “brown envelope” or whatever the local euphemism is. This was the case in all civilisations historically.

          Food not Bombs

          I’m familiar. My impression is that it’s a brand for throwing potlucks.

          They tend to be pretty secretive, because when they’re not the cops murder them or arrest them for terrorism.

          Usually they splinter within like a year and then hate each other forever, if that’s the sort of group you’re talking about. If they don’t, it’s because they grow a governance system, and just push out dissenters periodically.

          If you haven’t studied human coordination, even casually, why spout off about your opinions?

          I have. Anthropology is great, sociology and political science are neat too. You may have noticed my interest in history. Just not “management philosophies”, except enough to realise they’re largely snake oil for people faking competence.

          You’re an idiot.

          We all are.


          Bandwidth

          This is actually neat to hear, so it gets it’s own section. That’s exactly how I think of it. The difference is that as far as I can tell it’s a bottleneck between every single human, including us right now. Nobody understands things handled more than a couple of degrees of separation away, which is insufficient to directly run a complex industrial economy.

          When organisations work it’s because they’re self-correcting regardless of some opacity. Yes, that always involves guns, even if it’s at the very abstract level; pacifism gets you killed.

          • melpomenesclevage
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Well it seems you know so much about these organizations than me, despite my decade of experience, and so much more about the phenomenon, despite my years of study. I defer to your expertise.

            we all are

            This conversation is not generalizable to the population at large!

            bandwidth

            What youre talking about is attenuation. Also, how is an authority immune to this? Nobody who makes decisions is within five degrees of normal. There are ways around this. I can recommend a dense podcast or a dense doorstopper book+a normalish book as a primer.

            an ‘organization’ is a magic spell that completely negates this immutable human nature ive been talking about. And yes requires a fuhrer.

            K

            yes that always involves guns

            Nah, your way doesn’t threaten anyone in power.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              All right, well, I’ll just end off with “Fuhrers don’t control anything”. Look at Gorbachev; he tried to change the system and it launched multiple coups against him until he was gone. Organisations (or institutions, or whatever word you’d prefer) run themselves, there’s no such a thing as a leader.

              Last word is yours, I guess.

              • melpomenesclevage
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                So institutions are magic and unaccountable inhuman systems are a good thing?

                I remember a story about a guy, world war one vet, that war fucked him up, became a rabid Nazi literally in it for the dehumanization and (the ‘I jack off to being turned into paste by a beautiful perfect machine’ itallian futurist) type philosophy, Until he saw what the Bolshevik reactionaries did with Russia.

                He was immediately and unironicly like ‘hey, wow, this is so much worse. I’m defecting to these guys now.’ and then did it.

                You remind me of that. This is praise of your novelty, condemnation of your everything else. Big ‘thanks, I hate it!’ Vibes