• illi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can’t get up until it moves, that’s the rules

      • Sotuanduso
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        96
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Can’t get up until it moves, that’s they rules

          • Sotuanduso
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            They doe is a being not an object.

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The doe has no concept of pronouns. I promise calling it “it” isn’t doing anything to hurt it.

          • emptiestplace@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            As someone who has been vegan for 25 years, I really appreciate your choices and empathize with your motivations. If, however, your goal is to make a difference, you might want to avoid alienating your audience before you’ve even said anything.

              • ManniSturgis@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I wouldn’t, but I am calling animals it. Only in English tho, we don’t do that in my native language.

              • UnearthedUnusual
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I know a few people who use it/its pronouns. While I agree that treating animals with respect is a good thing, it pronouns are not necessarily a sign of disrespect or objectification.

                • Beaver [she/her]@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Well in that case that is different but usually when we say “it” that is used to refer to physical objects like book or treat. Animals being seen as property harms them.

                  • intensely_human
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    No, because people can be respectful of animals while using the word “it”.

                    You’re asserting all this extra stuff that the word does not convey, because you’ve unconsciously decided that is the only way to use the word.

                    But as others are telling you, and is true, it is common in English to use “it” for animals. Despite what your lit teacher told you, that does not create disrespect for the animals. People have been caring for animals, people with hearts, people who don’t treat animals the way they would a book, while using the word “it”, for as long as the English language had existed.

                    That thing where you can’t have empathy for an “it”, that a rule in your head.

                  • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    The person getting upset at another person calling a doe an it, telling another to touch grass is just peak internet.

                  • No_
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    Mods really are the worst, why is this reply above about touching grass not removed but the upvoted ones are? Fucking bastards.

              • intensely_human
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                But you would immediately jump in to correct another adult’s use of language, as if they were a child. Despite this talk of respect.

                  • No_
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    From the person who said “touch some grass buddy”. You cannot get more condescending or hypocritical than that. Narcissists will narcissist.

      • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Using “it” for an animal is perfectly reasonable. An argument can be made for using they instead but we even use it for humans occasionally (e.g. Jack checked on the baby, it was sleeping peacefully).