Donald Trump is trying to bring into politics a phenomenon that’s taking off in college athletics: money for use of the former president’s name, image and likeness in campaign ads.

In a letter this week, the Trump presidential campaign asked all down-ballot GOP campaigns for at least a 5% cut of the money raised from advertising that features the party’s 2024 presumptive White House nominee.

“We ask that all candidates and committees who choose to use President Trump’s name, image, and likeness split a minimum of 5% of all fundraising solicitations to Trump National Committee JFC,” said the April 15 letter signed by campaign co-campaign managers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita.

  • EatATaco
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Clinton is as responsible for the four years of Trump as any individual not named Trump.

    Nah, Comey gets that nod by bucking FBI policy not once but twice to publicly fuck Clinton during the campaign. The second time just days before the election. Had he just done what the FBI has always dose, and silently open and close cases they are working on, Clinton likely cruises to win the election.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree Comey is a ratfucker, but Clinton dropped the ball so many fucking times. She failed the ground game in Michigan and Wisconsin, she failed in Pennsylvania and Arizona, all states that were entirely winnable (and she thought she had them in the bag) but voters didn’t show up for her. She pulled money from the “safe” counties, but worse than that she failed to make a case why anyone should vote for her. She had no platform, she was out front on zero wedge issues, and spent more time antagonizing progressive voters than she spent courting them. And they still showed up to vote for her, because progressives didn’t want Trump. It was the moderates who shrugged and said “what’s the worst that can happen?”

      • EatATaco
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        She followed the standard Democrat strategy in PA and successfully did it better than Obama, at least on the base. She only slightly underperformed vote totals in rural counties. The issue is that trump brought people into the vote. Not moderates, but non voting rural voters who believe they had been left behind. And did so in droves.

        She lost because she was an establishment candidate, doing typical establishment things (very successfully) at a period of time of strong anti establishment…and here comes this guy, whose genius is in the ability to sell himself, who said all the right things about being anti establishment.

        Clinton was your typical politician. She played by the book and did so pretty well. And of course this includes focusing on a swing state like pa. Can we look back and think of things she could have done better? Of course, hind sight is 20/20. But the issue is that they didn’t sense, noone really did (Im not even convinced trump did), how much people were desperate to vote for a non establishment candidate.

        She wasn’t a bad a candidate, just the same old at the wrong time.

        But comey legitimately did things that they pretty much never do that fucked her. It was a knowingly harmful action, right before the election, where she lost some places with razor thin margins. He fucked us, very intentionally, even if he didn’t think it would swing the election.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Democrats need to let go of the revisionist “she did very well compared to Obama” bullshit.

          It was her job to win the election, a job she fought bitterly to have, and she didn’t. She failed. She failed the party, and she failed America.

          And you need to let go of the “nobody saw this coming” bullshit. Plenty of people saw it coming, but they were dismissed and ignored.

          She lost because she was an establishment candidate, doing typical establishment things (very successfully) at a period of time of strong anti establishment

          The modern Democratic party had never won an election with an establishment candidate. Carter did not have the support of the party, Bill Clinton invented his own “new Democrats” because all of the establishment Dems thought HW was unbeatable, and Obama had to squeeze out Hillary, Biden, John Edwards, and Chris Dodd as the disruptor. Meanwhile, Mondale, Gore, Kerry, Dukakis, rank and file candidates all, and all of them losers.

          There is no such thing as a “typical politician” or a “typical race” at the presidential level. There is no one winning strategy that works in all elections, no national map that tracks across generations, no conventional wisdom that holds up to scrutiny.

          Clinton was responsible for developing a strategy to beat her opponent. She wasn’t running against Obama. She didn’t need to beat Obama’s turnout, she needed to beat Trump’s turnout.

          She wasn’t a bad a candidate, just the same old at the wrong time.

          She was, objectively, a bad candidate. Trump was beatable, and she had a massive advantage in fundraising and experience and campaigning. She was smarter and more capable than her opponent, and had the money and infrastructure to monitor his moves and outmaneuver him at every turn.

          Instead, she shat the bed. It wasn’t even close. There were five states where she thought she was winning and was exposed to be completely out of touch. That’s not someone else’s fault. There wasn’t some magical intervention or deus ex machina at the last minute. Hillary simply failed to convince enough voters to show up for her.

          Having lived through it, watching it happen in real time, that was extremely frustrating. Having someone tell me after the fact that “well, actually she had statistically more of the base than previous elections” is maddening.

          But the real kick in the balls is watching Biden make the same mistakes, try the same strategies that failed before, recognizing that Biden is our best hope to avoid catastrophe, and realizing that Trump is on track to move back into the White House.