@simple to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agoWhy do cameras call it "Macro Lens" if it zooms in and is used to capture tiny objects? Shouldn't it be "Micro Lens"?message-square13arrow-up172arrow-down16
arrow-up166arrow-down1message-squareWhy do cameras call it "Macro Lens" if it zooms in and is used to capture tiny objects? Shouldn't it be "Micro Lens"?@simple to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square13
minus-square@AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 month agoDepends, I think. In the same order of magnitude definitely. Edit: this makes me wonder, is it possible to get an orthographic perspective with an ordinary size (but maybe not standard) lens on a normal camera?
minus-square@randombullet@programming.devlinkfedilink1•1 month agoI suppose tilt shift lenses can achieve that.
minus-square@Paragone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-1•1 month agoNo, tilt-shift doesn’t have any bearing on whether it’s focal-length is high-enough to make the magnification 1:1… hth! _ /\ _
Depends, I think. In the same order of magnitude definitely.
Edit: this makes me wonder, is it possible to get an orthographic perspective with an ordinary size (but maybe not standard) lens on a normal camera?
I suppose tilt shift lenses can achieve that.
No, tilt-shift doesn’t have any bearing on whether it’s focal-length is high-enough to make the magnification 1:1…
hth!
_ /\ _