• gregorum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You’re free to your “beliefs”, but the evidence here contradicts them

      • gregorum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’ve clearly established it as fact, using evidence, repeatedly.

        Unlike you and your “beliefs“ about health insurance and gambling

          • gregorum
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            No, it’s proving that you’re wrong with evidence to back up my claims that your “beliefs” on this subject are clearly based on ignorance.

            Your choice to gamble your health and well-being on that ignorance is your own responsibility.

              • gregorum
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                There’s that convenient amnesia again!

                  • gregorum
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    There’s that amnesia again! You asked and I answered this question an hour ago:

                    You already produced that evidence when you commented…every time you comment. And I point it out every time. Just like the ad hominem attacks. But you seem to have serious memory problems.

                    It’s irrational to blame others for things you, yourself, do and say.

                    Now you’re just Sealioning

                    Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity (“I’m just trying to have a debate”), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.[1][2][3][4] It may take the form of “incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate”,[5] and has been likened to a  denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings.[6] The term originated with a 2014 strip of the webcomicWondermark by David Malki,[7] which The Independent called “the most apt description of Twitter you’ll ever see”.