• TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    20 days ago

    If only they hadn’t shot themselves so hard in the foot during covid with their book lending, and dug the hole so much deeper with their piss poor handling of the lawsuit.

    While I do very much support what they do, I’d be reluctant to give them money, if only because it might go to paying their dumbass lawyer.

    • The Doctor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      That lawsuit was a long time in coming. Covid just goosed the schedule forward about a year, and probably made it easier.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        The lawsuit wasn’t coming because they were in a strong grey area with one physical copy per digital. By offering unlimited copies they directly invited a lawsuit.

        And then their legal defense had absolutely no competency behind it. They didn’t come with any legal principles, they basically just said “we shouldn’t be punished because we’re nice”, and then they tried the same style of argument during appeal, basically throwing money away on legal expenses. All the while they were campaigning for donations - the people that supported them were paying the lawyers, not for the IA’s regular activities.

    • Pringles
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      I actually agree that was handled very poorly. Knowingly crossing a line they had been repeatedly been warned for, was just begging for a lawsuit they were sure to lose. I have supported them in the past, but this has also held me back from supporting them since this happened.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        I mean I can forgive crossing the line, it was covid, which were special circumstances. It’s frustrating though because they basically ruined a good thing, lending one digital per physical copy they owned was a nice grey area, but now there is a ruling stating that is explicitly illegal.

        What I cannot forgive is their flimsy legal argument that had no legal principles behind it, and particularly the fact that they tried the same bullshit on appeal, instead of just cutting their losses. All the while they were campaigning for donations to pay for it.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      20 days ago

      Same here. I’m waiting to see that lawsuit reach its final conclusion, I don’t want to throw good money after bad.

      Even afterward, I’m concerned that they might go do some stupid stunt like that again. I’ll want to see if there’s any fallout among their leadership over getting into this situation.