• gregorum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    They’re mad because they’re terrified that, in order to compete without paying slave wages for Chinese labor, they might have to gasp! get paid less to make up the difference! Not smaller profits! Oh, no!

    • Oneser
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      How did you get that from the article?

      • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        29 days ago

        [Christian Bruch’s (CEO of Siemens Energy)] comments highlight the complexity for firms desperately needing supplies and parts manufactured in China, but not the competition from complete kits made there that undercut Western firms.

        • Oneser
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          I understand this to mean: “there are no suppliers for some parts outside of China” rather than “my margins are affected, waaawaa”

          Like try and buy clay that hasn’t been processed at some point through China, or any piece of machinery that doesn’t have a component inside which originates in China. Hell, even try go 24 hours without using a Chinese product.

          This is why many countries are looking at re-implimenting protectionism, because we have reached a situation of non-control, regardless of domestic wants.

          I don’t think I agree with their (Siemens Energy’s) stance, without a Long term solution to change the issue, but I understand it’s place in the grand scheme.

      • gregorum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        I read it— but, more importantly, I also know the one thing that China has which constantly allows them to undercut Western manufacturing: cheap labor.