Personally, Gaza and his anti-railway workers union action was enough to destroy any credibility he had so far.

        • Nocturne Dragonite@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Restraining them by -checks notes- sending them weapons and allowing them to use their satellite data to bomb them? By trying to redefine antisemitism as criticism of Israel and therefore trying to validate their actions?🤔

            • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              26
              ·
              2 months ago

              The word you’re looking for is “enabling”, as in “Joe is enabling the genocide of Palestinians less than Trump would”.

              Also you need something to back up the claim.

                • Nocturne Dragonite@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Nigga the point is both sides are doing the same shit so why vote for either? Jesus man

                  What ballot initiative is there we can vote on to stop the genocide?

                • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  when he threatened to pause

                  So… I’m not hearing that he actually paused, or even reduced, the weapon shipments here, which kinda means you’re still just assuring us that trump would definitely be way worse.

        • Yllych [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ok so try political change that destroys a system that forces you to vote for blue or red genocide every 2 years

            • Cowbee [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              24
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              If neither major presidential candidate is moving against genocide, might it be better to build up a new party that is against genocide, or join an existing anti-genocide party?

                • Cowbee [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  21
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Is it better to build an entirely new political party vs vote for the better of two candidates in the 2024 election?

                  Depends on the direct ways in which one party is better, by how much, and what will materially change.

                  Your imaginary new party does not and will not have a candidate in 2024 so that isn’t a relevant proposal.

                  PSL does exist, and Claudia De La Cruz is on the ballot representing them. If that’s all that is necessary to be a relevant proposal then I implore you to suggest PSL to your friends and family.

                  The easier alternative is to work in the primaries to get a candidate you prefer into the two-candidate race.

                  Sure wish there was a Primary I could have voted in, and I sure wish the DNC had any good candidates to begin with.

                  Might it be better to build a new party instead of that? Depends on how you think the new party will be received. Maybe.

                  PSL has been recieving increased support at a rapid pace.