CONTENT NOTICE: This article contains graphic mention of child sexual abuse and child physical abuse. Reader discretion is appreciated. Reduxx has learned that a Professor Emeritus at California State University and a top consultant to the world’s leading transgender health authority directly contributed to an erotic story featuring themes of the graphic mutilation and sexual […]
    • BananaSpikeOP
      39·
      2 months ago

      I do like socks, but I’m no puppet. I’m interested in discussion about this article because it looks legitimate, which is horrifying. If you’re able to disprove the claims, that would be a relief.

        • BananaSpikeOP
          28·
          2 months ago

          How about this? “WPATH removed lower age limits in SOC8 while consulting with child castration fetishists”

            • BananaSpikeOP
              17·
              2 months ago

              This is the sort of useful conversation I was looking to have. I think we’re in agreement. In another comment, I wrote this:

              WPATH should clean house and purge all pedophiles, retract SOC 8, publish an apology, and write a new version that doesn’t have input from known pedophiles.

              Which might not be how you would phrase it, but largely agrees with:

              If that’s the case then I think most sane people would agree they should not consult with them anymore, and revisit any influence they might have had on policy.