Kamala Harris, who launched her campaign for president, has long been a favorite of Hollywood donors.

Kamala Harris has launched her campaign for the White House, after President Joe Biden stepped aside Sunday under pressure from party leaders.

The vice president has Biden’s endorsement, and is unchallenged as yet for the Democratic nomination, which will be formally decided at the Aug. 19 convention in Chicago.

“I am honored to have the President’s endorsement and my intention is to earn and win this nomination,” Harris said in a statement. “I will do everything in my power to unite the Democratic Party—and unite our nation—to defeat Donald Trump and his extreme Project 2025 agenda. We have 107 days until Election Day. Together, we will fight. And together, we will win.”

In her statement, the vice president paid tribute to Biden’s “extraordinary leadership,” saying he had achieved more in one term than many presidents do in two.

  • MyOpinion
    575·
    2 months ago

    Kamala Harris I look forward to you wiping the floor with the Orange Turd.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      612·
      2 months ago

      The next debate should be hilarious. Someone with facts and speaking ability vs a windbag lie machine

      • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
        261·
        2 months ago

        Also, she is a cop/lawyer. She’s prolly pretty good at arguing as long as she can handle the big(ger) stage.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          7·
          2 months ago

          I wonder if she convicted anyone of falsification of business records? It would be interesting if she mentioned that as one of her past accomplishments while on the stage with someone found guilty of 34 counts of that crime.

      • JimSamtanko
        201·
        2 months ago

        Trump won’t debate her. He’s fucking stupid, but he’s not that fucking stupid.

        • Drunemeton@lemmy.worldEnglish
          12·
          2 months ago

          Oh I quite think that he’d love to debate her! However his handlers will absolutely go bonkers trying to get him to shut up about it to keep that from happening.

        • kronisk @lemmy.world
          10·
          2 months ago

          So she should go on Twitter every fucking day and make jokes about how he’s too much of a coward to debate her. A narcissist can’t handle a bruised ego.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      589·
      2 months ago

      She has less than 4 months and was completely invisible before. She is going to lose hard and this time we can really blame the Dems for betraying Biden this late in the race.

      • Xanis@lemmy.world
        317·
        2 months ago

        About 30 seconds ago I felt a little smarter not knowing you exist, yet in so few words you’ve made yourself pretty thoroughly known.

        Four months is plenty of time. Biden will be backing her. The DNC has voting wolves ready to kick their asses. Bernie and AOC both supported Biden and are wise enough to support Harris, and others will follow their example. Back to point #2, and to reaaaally highlight something obscenely important:

        They listened.

        Take that in for a meager second. Now ask yourself if we could get those prideful fucks to back down, and also get an old lifetime politician to step aside in a historical move, do you understand what we could potentially do if we complained half as hard as you do when so much shit isn’t on the line?

        Oh, and give us an alternative that matches three things:

        1. Not invisible
        2. Likely to have larger support
        3. Not old asf

        I think you’ll find 3 to be rather important for a LOT of people right now.

        • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
          83·
          2 months ago

          I’m saving this to use later, because it’s amazing, thank you, “About 30 seconds ago I felt a little smarter not knowing you exist”

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          12·
          2 months ago

          I prolly agree with you, and you seem to have a good handle on the current political climate (thus an intelligent head on your shoulders), which is why I think it’s worth my time to suggest some introspection w/r/t your first sentence. Thanks for your consideration.

            • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
              14·
              2 months ago

              If only they had actual arguments instead of cute naivety. But hey, some americans just deserve project 2025.

              • Xanis@lemmy.world
                4·
                2 months ago

                I notice you never answered my question. You sure responded to others, which is your right. Go on, give us an alternative that match the necessary criteria I listed. Here, I’ll make it easy:

                1. Not invisible
                2. Likely to have larger support
                3. Not old asf
          • Xanis@lemmy.world
            2·
            2 months ago

            Before the Pandemic I would have agreed. However, because of people’s stubbornness and unwillingness to listen to facts, proof, and the science itself, people died. Many of them died through no fault of their own, or the fault of others, which is bad enough. However, many died because of those we gave too much leeway and understanding to. If being hopelessly polite and stretching my own patience to unimaginable lengths cause ANYONE to die, I may as well be a part of the cause of their death. Tolerance is no longer an option. Like it or not, there are lives at stake this time as well.

            I stood against the anti-vaccine and anti-mask fools. I am sure as hell going to stand against the people who in bad faith claim to be Democrats or left-leaning. Who claim to want what’s best. Who shout their claims that their way is the only way when it clearly leads us down a dark path. I will stand against them.

            Because it has to be done.

            • brbposting@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              2·
              2 months ago

              The pandemic blew my mind as well.

              Is it more of our gut feel or is it an evidence-based position that kicking off a response with 10% ad hominem before getting into the meat begets better results than skipping the ad hom?

              • Xanis@lemmy.world
                2·
                2 months ago

                Depends on what you’re replying to, really. Though honestly, some people are so hard and radically set in certain beliefs that I use it to spark conversation. Because you know the types I’m targeting rarely respond to reason. The goal then is to get them to respond at all.

                I know the playbook, you menial mentally mangled badly reconstructed sentient regressive bipedal sticks in the mud. I shall use it against you all! >:(

              • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                1·
                2 months ago

                Keep in mind while answering this question that your goal while arguing in front of an audience is to fend off ideas and not (necessarily) to convince the other person.

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          110·
          2 months ago

          Lol yeah what are Bernie and AOC supposed to do? Not support anyone and take on the backstabbers on their own? It is too late for any alternative. It was go with Biden who has a chance to win and beat Trump before or just giving Trump the win on the silver platter. Now I just hope Trump is so incompetent that there will be a next election or at least that he doesnt care about the rest of the world and only focusses on the US so at least we are safe. I hope the betraying Dems will realize their mistake and be deeply sorry for it.

          • Xanis@lemmy.world
            1·
            2 months ago

            I disagree. Biden slowly eroded his chance. Key moments were the beginning of his reelection campaign, the debate, and the failed assassination attempt on Trump. Because this election period is all about image, Biden hasn’t been able to keep up despite his intelligence and his strong and generally positive policies and record so far. In any other election year he’d be fine. At this moment he’s missed his chances to come back stronger than before. If his team and the DNC ran PR for a large corporation we’d be laughing them off of Twitter. They bumbled and through their combined negligence Trump has gained a stronger foothold with specifically the Right.

            I’ll explain a little more: When you are in a position of leadership there is a default level of trust you should strive to maintain, and trust is very difficult to gain back. So…

            1. Biden should have not sought reelection. However, because he did he should have come out and said that he believes he is best equipped to beat Trump. That if it became clear he wasn’t going to be able to that he would step aside for the best of this Nation and the people who put their trust in him. Boom. A leader who tells us straight and reinforces that he’s here for all of us.

            2. Not sought any debate. It was always lose-lose without a monumental performance. Trump looks like normal Trump and ANY fumble lowers Biden’s image. Had he had that showing 12 years ago people would have laughed it off and he’d recover and probably do okay. That isn’t this timeline. Rather than going Dark Brandon and really leaning into his strengths, injecting caffeine straight into his bloodstream, and take a couple weeks of back-to-back calls, speeches, and talkshows with hard questions where he doesn’t back down, he just…let it simmer. Recovery chance critically missed.

            3. The attempt on Trump’s life. This secured Biden in Trump’s shadow. Not because he lost any voters in particular, it likely didn’t shift the narrative and expectations. What happened is because Biden didn’t have a strong reelection foundation, despite great strides while in office, he allowed Trump to essentially camp out on his front lawn. Trump is a show man, which idiots mistake for charisma. Biden has moments of great leadership and a clarity which makes people want to follow him…at times. He lacks that spark which makes people want to follow consistently.

            This leaves us with three options:

            1. Keep Biden in and hope his name is enough to pull him back up, or something happens and all but guarantees a win.

            2. Find someone people want to follow and have them be in the constant spotlight for the next four months. I can think of maybe four people who have the charisma and political clout to make this work. None of them have volunteered.

            3. Nominate an individual who can make strong arguments against every position Trump takes and who will have historical significance if made President. This leads us to Harris. She is not particularly charismatic. Far as I’ve been able to tell, she CAN argue like a mofo. Charisma inspires confidence because it inspires hope, or at least grants the hopeless a direction. Lacking that doesn’t mean you can’t lead, it does mean you need to be stronger in other areas, and more importantly it means you only have to lead better than the other guy. This means Harris’s team needs a good writer for the moments where she needs to puff out her chest and square her shoulders, and also need to give her room to work her Prosecutor magic when needed.

            So far as my information goes, this is where we’re at. Dems need to play hard ball, which might be the most worrisome thing of it all.

            • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
              11·
              2 months ago

              I actually wasnt. I thought he was too old to run in the first place but always said its too late now to change.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        163·
        2 months ago

        Biden was going to lose. Do you really think they’d go through all this if that wasn’t the reality of the situation?

      • kent_eh@lemmy.caEnglish
        41·
        2 months ago

        and was completely invisible before.

        Only if you haven’t been paying attention.

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          14·
          2 months ago

          True, I forgot that a couple times it was talked about what a shit human and worse prosecutor she was.