• Petter1
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    Well, it would be a way for government to gain trust again through proofed transparency after they fucked up. Given the people under that government understand how blockchains work, I guess

    • OldWoodFrame
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      29 days ago

      But either the government blockchain can get forked/modified by people with enough resources, in which case it’s not reliable, or it is certifiably controlled by the government in which case there’s no point to it being blockchain.

      • Petter1
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Only if you make a system with POW and miners. With a DAG it should be possible to create a network where for example every person that issues a transaction (saving stuff into chain) validates two or more previous transactions on their device (or node if you run your own) using either PoW or PoS depending on what you want to achieve.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      I don’t think I understand the use case you just described. Can you explain further?

      • Petter1
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Like a way to make whole democratic government digital to achieve a more efficient political system. In my country we have a democracy but it is sooo slow, every decision needs years and like a ton of paper, which seems not very sustainable to me.