• volodya_ilich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    By the nine divines… Why does it take libs 80 years extra to reach the conclusions that Marxists have already described in detail in the last century…

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Most people who were paying attention to the world when 1929 happened and witnessed the consequences up to 1945 are dying now. The people who were paying attention to the world when 2008 happened haven’t seen how the story ends.

      • Crikeste
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oddly, 1929-1945 and 2008-2024 are the same distance apart. Were you trying to do that or is it just eerie coincidence?

    • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      because they live in a delusional fantasy world where belief in things corellates with warm fuzzy feelings more than congruence with material reality, “truth” is socially reinforced, and… shit, shit this reminds me of something.

    • kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      He is not taking a Marxist position. Possibly agreeing with parts of the same analysis as Marx but definitely not the same prescription. Not every criticism of Capitalism is an endorsement of Marxism

      • volodya_ilich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        He is not taking a Marxist position

        Precisely that’s why it’s taken him 80 years longer than Marxists to reach that conclusion.

        Not every criticism of Capitalism is an endorsement of Marxism

        Which is why non-marxist anti-capitalist movements such as Salvador Allende’s socialism in Chile, or Mosaddegh’s Iran, inevitably fail within a few years due to the lack of understanding of class struggle and the history of capitalism.

        • kaffiene@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          I take it you have a Marxist state as a counter example showing it’s superiority and longevity?

          • volodya_ilich
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            USSR lasted much longer than Allende’s project, and Cuba is still ongoing

            • kaffiene@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              The question was superiority and longevity. Are you claiming those are both superior states as well?

              • volodya_ilich
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                The USSR and Cuba are much more desirable than the short-lived wannabe socialist regime that led to Pinochet’s dictatorship, yes, how do you not see this?