The principal’s action was the result of a new state law that had gone into effect just months earlier, heightening penalties for students who make threats at school. Passed after a former student shot and killed six people at The Covenant School in Nashville, the law requires students to be expelled for at least a year if they threaten mass violence on school property, making it a zero-tolerance offense.

Tennessee lawmakers claimed that ramping up punishments for threats would help prevent serious acts of violence. “What we’re really doing is sending a message that says ‘Hey, this is not a joke, this is not a joking matter, so don’t do this,’” state Sen. Jon Lundberg, a co-sponsor of the legislation, told a Chattanooga news station a week and a half after the law went into effect.

Tennessee school officials have used the law to expel students for mildly disruptive behavior, according to advocates and lawyers across the state who spoke with ProPublica. (In Tennessee and a number of other states, expulsions aren’t necessarily permanent.) Some students have been expelled even when officials themselves determined that the threat was not credible. Lawmakers did put a new fix in place in May that limits expulsions to students who make “valid” threats of mass violence. But that still leaves it up to administrators to determine which threats are valid.

In some cases last school year, administrators handed off the responsibility of dealing with minor incidents to law enforcement. As a result, the type of misbehavior that would normally result in a scolding or brief suspension has led to children being not just expelled but also arrested, charged and placed in juvenile detention, according to juvenile defense lawyers and a recent lawsuit.

  • Gerudo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    20 days ago

    As much as I hate to admit it, I understand zero tolerance policies. But a fucking year? There’s got to be some kind of sliding scale based on the offense. Draw a picture of a gun, 3 days. Finger guns, ok, a week. Toy gun, month. Real gun, jail.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 days ago

      I don’t understand zero tolerance policies.

      Seems like a way for school sit be lazy and not actually do anything.

    • andrewta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      Draw a picture of a gun = 3 weeks of suspension?

      What the actual fuck?

      A picture? Really?

      I mean if the picture was off a kid holding a gun shooting a teacher, maybe get the kid some help.

      But a picture of a gun? Again…

      What the actual fuck?

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      As much as I hate to admit it, I understand zero tolerance policies.

      What is it that you understand about them? Is it that all extant data suggest that they are not effective in increasing the safety of childhood learning environments? Or that they have a statistically-significant impact on juvenile and adult rates of incarceration and criminality, increasing both (ex. children who are students at schools with SROs are five times more likely to get arrested for disorderly conduct)? Or is it that zero-tolerance policies, while resulting in overall increases in student suspension rates, additionally result in an additional two-fold increase for black children?

      https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/rel/Products/Region/midwest/Ask-A-REL/10185

      Basically, my point is that zero tolerance policies enable racial discrimination against children of color and has measurable long-term educational and legal implications on children well into adulthood. It is, simply put, state-sanctioned children abuse.