Anyway, Alien: Romulus is the seventh film about these particular monsters. According to the producers, the film takes the franchise ‘back to its roots’. So we get a group of grimy crew-mates piloting a big rust-bucket of a spaceship who pick up an extraterrestrial stowaway and end up having to use their wits and courage to survive as it gobbles them up, one by one.

And it’s not a bad film. It’s nicely creepy, the special effects are good, the acting is perfectly serviceable. In fact, I could give you a normal review of Alien: Romulus, but just writing this is making me feel a little crazy. It’s not a bad film, but it’s also a direct copy of a much better film that already exists. That film is called Alien, and it came out in 1979. It had Sigourney Weaver in it. It hasn’t vanished. If you have a Disney+ subscription or a torrent client, you can watch it tonight. Why have we made it again? What’s the point? Why have we spent the past 45 years – which is longer than I’ve been alive – making seven different versions of the same film? What on Earth is going on?

  • muzzle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Alien and aliens are 2 very different take on the same ide (opinions differ on Alien 3), that is not the reviewer claim.

    Their point is that Romulus is a useless remake of a much better original.

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      23 days ago

      Alien and aliens are 2 very different take on the same ide

      So are Ghostbusters and the Others.

      What is your fucking point?

      • muzzle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        My comment was truncated, but your rudeness convinced me to stop interacting with you.