• notabot
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 days ago

    ‘Sealed sender’ seems to avoid this by not actually requiring the client to authenticate to the server at all, and relying on the recipient to validate that it’s signed by the sender they expect from the encrypted data in the envelope. As I mentioned in another reply, I’m just going on what they’ve published on the system, so either I could be completely wrong, or they could be being misleading, but it does look like they’ve tried to address this issue.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      I’m just going on what they’ve published on the system, so either I could be completely wrong, or they could be being misleading

      same here overall. thank you for responding.