• FluffyPotato
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I tried to understand why they were defending governments like in Russia, North Korea and China but got permabanned for sectarianism.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      In the case of Russia, Hexbear largely hates it, they just believe it to be working against NATO. As for the DPRK and PRC, Hexbear defends AES over Capitalist countries, and that includes Anarchists.

      It’s impossible to be an Anarchist and side with Western Hegemony.

      • FluffyPotato
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You don’t need to side with any hegemony but defending countries that would and have killed anarchist movements makes you less of an anarchist than one that does defend any western power.

        Ultimately advocating for anarchist ideals is more likely to work outside of authoritarian governments so I cannot understand how hexbear can defend those. But then again people vote against their interests all the time so maybe I shouldn’t be surprised.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          defending countries that would and have killed anarchist movements makes you less of an anarchist than one that does defend any western power.

          Western powers kill Anarchists too, to a greater extent. If you do not understand this, you are not an Anarchist.

          Ultimately advocating for anarchist ideals is more likely to work outside of authoritarian governments so I cannot understand how hexbear can defend those. But then again people vote against their interests all the time so maybe I shouldn’t be surprised.

          Anarchists picking Socialism over Capitalism and Imperialism makes sense

          • FluffyPotato
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I need some evidence to believe that authoritarian nations kill and surpress anarchists less than others.

            Also none of those nations offer socialism any more than anyone else.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I need some evidence to believe that authoritarian nations kill and surpress anarchists less than others.

              You’re an Anarchist, all nations should be authoritarian if you were consistent with your views. If you legitimately believe Socialism to be more authoritarian than Capitalism you’re LARPing as an Anarchist.

              Also none of those nations offer socialism any more than anyone else.

              Citation needed.

              • FluffyPotato
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’m guessing you aren’t an anarchist because that’s mostly about unjust hierarchies, not conflating the word authoritarian.

                Socialism and capitalism is about who controls the means of production. In authoritarian countries that would usually be the state or ruling party making it no better than the bourgeoisie of a capitalist country and in socialist ones it would be the workers. I know of no country where the workers control the means of production. Workers having democratic control over the means of production is absolutely essential for socialism.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I’m guessing you aren’t an anarchist because that’s mostly about unjust hierarchies, not conflating the word authoritarian.

                  I’m a Communist that works with and speaks with Anarchists.

                  Socialism and capitalism is about who controls the means of production. In authoritarian countries that would usually be the state or ruling party making it no better than the bourgeoisie of a capitalist country and in socialist ones it would be the workers. I know of no country where the workers control the means of production. Workers having democratic control over the means of production is absolutely essential for socialism.

                  Then you need to study up on AES countries, as there have been and continue to be Socialist countries, despite them not being Anarchist.

                  A state largely governed by a Communist Party that practices strong central planning and works against bourgeois control is Socialist. As an example, the USSR, where there were large implementations of democratization:

                  And large reductions in wealth disparity:

                  Despite overall GDP growth:

                  • FluffyPotato
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Hah, I grew up in the soviet occupied Estonia, democracy did not exist and neither did socialism. Advocating for anarchist ideas also got you locked up. I know enough about countries dressing themselves up as socialist to not fall for it. Socialism does not exist without workers democratically controlling the means of production.