What’d y’all think of the debate?

  • NeuromancerM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    Bankruptcy is a legal matter. Either a person files or they don’t.

    I also wouldn’t shame someone for filing.

    Much less would I shame a business person for filing against their business if needed.

    Sure Kamala has never filed a BK on a business but she’s never ran a business. She’s never created jobs.

    Dislike Trump all you want but has created thousands of jobs. Kamala zero.

    • GBU_28
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The statement is true, per the specifications I allowed. I never indicated any value assessment as you focused on. That’s not the point

      Edit, to address the goalpost move: as a DA she certainly would have been in charge of staffing an office and had many humans in jobs. More than zero. So that’s not true

      • NeuromancerM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        She didn’t create those jobs. she didn’t run a p/l. The money didn’t come from her but from the state of California or the county depending on which job she did. The tax payers paid for those jobs.

        • GBU_28
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          Her office would have designated the need for positions and filled them. They would have had a budget and worked within it to staff.

          Another goalpost move on p/l.

          • NeuromancerM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            No goal post as been moved. She did not create jobs. She’s never run a business. She proudly proclaimed she’s always been on the government teat.

            I prefer someone who actually creates jobs

            • GBU_28
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              My original involvement was to fact check the bankruptcy claim, not discuss the value or issues with bankruptcy. The goal posts were moved to bring up Harris being a long time government employee. I spent replies discussing how.the differences are largely semantic, but that’s literally besides my original point, and you are free to have your opinion on government work, because it’s not what I’m here for anyway.

              Trump, as leader of his businesses, DID file bankruptcies, as the article describes.

              • NeuromancerM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 days ago

                Goal post wasn’t moved. It’s all a continuation of her lies. Trump never filed bankruptcy. Harris has never created a job or a business. It isn’t semantic. lol. It’s facts. I get the left hates facts but she lied. As a lawyer, she knows the differences.

                • GBU_28
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  Facts indeed. I provided a source of the bankruptcies for companies that he was the leader of, as I specified.

                  Edit Any discussion of the consequences of those bankruptcies or the validity of candidates based on their business background is outside of the scope, and a goalpost move.

                  • NeuromancerM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Yes, but that isn’t the same as Trump filing for bankruptcy. That was a lie. She has a pattern of lying, and she knows the difference. It is also a weird thing to judge someone on as it shows a lack of knowledge of the business world and proves she isn’t fit to lead the nation. She has no clue how to create jobs or that bankruptcies are common. Sometimes you hit a home run and sometimes you don’t. She wouldn’t know because she had never done either.