• josephsh5
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Why is Nintendo in particular this aggressive against emulators? Why haven’t we heard of Sony going after PCSX2 and RPCS3, or Microsoft going after Xenia and Xemu?

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Because none of those emulate current generation systems.

      People act weirdly entitled about Nintendo product, throw shitfits when Nintendo reacts exactly like Sony or Microsoft would to them doing the same thing, then act extra hurt that Nintendo did it.

    • vinnymac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It is likely due to age and popularity. At this point PCSX2 is the only widely popular emulator you’ve listed, but is older, in the same way Dolphin is old and less of a concern of harming their limelight. That isn’t to say those other emulators aren’t making waves lately, but there is a window between age and popularity that makes this software a prime target. Especially emulators for current gen, which has been historically very rare, and when it did exist were no where near as good as CEMU, Yuzu, and Ryujinx were.

      • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        In general I’d agree, although Citra feels like an exception. I’m not quite sure why they targeted that one so hard.

      • josephsh5
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I think this also shows how underpowered Nintendo consoles are; the Switch is essentially a slightly upgraded Wii U, which itself was only marginally better than the PS3 and Xbox 360! If Nintendo really wanted to combat piracy, all they had to do was beef up their flagship console to the point where it’s hard to emulate.