Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 15 hours agoImplicit bias ruleslrpnk.netimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1602arrow-down17
arrow-up1595arrow-down1imageImplicit bias ruleslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 15 hours agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squareBmeBenjilinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 hours agoIt does kind of sound cool but I thought the current trend was to move away from needlessly gendered language, especially with how in English a lot of feminine nouns are intentionally made to sound like a diminutive form of the masculine version
minus-squareXyre@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 hours agoDefinitely agree with preferring non-gendered language. But it also doesn’t feel like right to default to the (historically) masculine version either.
It does kind of sound cool but I thought the current trend was to move away from needlessly gendered language, especially with how in English a lot of feminine nouns are intentionally made to sound like a diminutive form of the masculine version
Definitely agree with preferring non-gendered language. But it also doesn’t feel like right to default to the (historically) masculine version either.