Note: Original report by Bloomberg, article by Reuters proxied by Neuters to bypass paywall.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      What’s to stop them just making another browser?

      Nothing. Chromium is open source. So they could just fork it and declare a new “official” google browser and it would be a lot like Chrome.

      I’m not sure why the govt thinks forcing google to give up a particular fork/branch of an open source browser is all that meaningful. It might make more sense if Chrome was a closed source one of a kind browser.

      • Ilovethebomb
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        That’s exactly what I was thinking. It also makes Chrome essentially worthless to anyone except Google.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They didn’t make the first one! They got it from Apple, who themselves got it from KDE.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not needed. Internet Explorer existed for years after the 90s. It wasn’t killed by the courts. It was killed by the fact that it’s only function was to install a better browser on first boot.

      • cdf12345
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I think you are severely underestimating how many people don’t even understand the difference between windows, explorer, a web browser and even the Internet itself during the 90’s well into the 2000’s even 2010’s.

        That’s who kept IE alive