A black mom was trying to cross the street from a bus stop, because the nearest crosswalk was almost a mile away. A driver hits her child and she gets blamed for “jay walking”. Just an insanely evil country.

  • EinfachUnersetzlich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article says the nearest crossing was 0.3 miles away. It’s still bad but you’re making it sound worse than it is.

    • Che Banana@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Still, I thought it was legal to cross if the nearest crosswalk was more than a block away. I’m sure it’s a "depends on the state thing…still bullshit though

          • EinfachUnersetzlich
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            No…the UK. Jaywalking as a concept doesn’t exist, you’re entitled to cross the road wherever it’s safe (* with exceptions).

        • Che Banana@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the US early in the auto age it became a crime…like loitering, only enforced when convenient.

          If you dislike that you’ll reeeally hate how many times bikers get blamed for getting run over…

    • JohnEdwa@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here in Finland it’s legal to cross the road if the closest crosswalk is further than 50 metres (164 feet), but cars still have the right of way so if you get hit, it is mostly your fault - they aren’t obviously legally allowed to just drive over you though.