• lorez
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Such a being doesn’t deserve decency.

          • lorez
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I bet it wasn’t used to describe an angel of death…

            • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              No, it was used to describe Jews, Roma, Homosexuals, Communists, and pretty much everybody the Nazis disliked.

              As the poster further up the chain said, decency is for everyone or it is not decent.

              • lorez
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I disagree. I’m not talking about some group of people some other group doesn’t like, but somebody who’s universally despised, somebody who does things so against our nature it’s nuts. Some people deserve decency, some others do not.

                • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I disagree, it is dangerous to dehumanise people no matter how disgusting we find them. People are still people man, we may never understand how they think or why they do the things that they do.

                  History has shown time and again where dehumanisation leads to.

                  • lorez
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Not dehumanizing. Some things she doesn’t deserve cos of her behaviour. Freedom of movement for example. To me she doesn’t deserve decency either.