• deaf_fish
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    No one will face consequences. Everything the companies are currently doing is legal or unenforceable.

    • vivadanang
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      and with fanboy shitbirds like you to stick up for them, perhaps the world isn’t worth saving anyway.

      • deaf_fish
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Trust me I wish there would be consequences, so most of us could be alive in 20 years.

        • vivadanang
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          holding them accountable for genocide wouldn’t change the results, it would simply be some iota of justice. there’s no turning the bus at this point, the crazies and coal rollers are just gonna keep pushing the gas - we’ve already gone off the cliff. The question that remains is can anything be saved that will resemble our civilization? It will take hundreds of years to reduce back from 2c and we def won’t stop at 2c.

          • deaf_fish
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            The question that remains is can anything be saved that will resemble our civilization?

            Yes, giant geo engineering projects will kill way less people than runaway global warning. Let’s do the Matrix movie thing where we covered our planet in continuous cloud cover. \s

            • vivadanang
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              this is why I’d prefer to skip geoengineering and, though the scale is mind-boggling and the costs tremendous, go full hog on a solar occluder. a big disc in space made of lunar regolith and recycled space junk. this is a herculean task, but would prevent us from playing scary games with our one breathing, semi-functional atmosphere. by blocking a small but growing percentage of sunlight, as the project goes on, it should be possible to keep ground level temps from getting deadly hot. eventually you could build solar generation on such a space object and microwave gigawatts back to earth, while simultaneously lowering global temps in a controllable manner.

              I know a lot of this sounds pie-in-the-sky, but really it’s the convergence of many, many different fields opening possibilities never speculated upon in the past. Automated manufacturing, robot mining, lunar-based perskovite solar cell manufacturing, SpaceX’s starship to haul all this shit to the moon and start building - so many of these individual parts either didn’t exist at all 20 years ago, or were fantastic leaps of science fiction - and now they’re literally coming together. And boy do we need 'em all.

              I see this is as the ultimate make/break point for our species, yeah we achieved spaceflight and nuclear power and, I dunno, The Rolling Stones, but if we can’t survive the effluence our industrial output exhales we really aren’t shit as a species. We’ll have to work together too.

              so… \s or not, if we don’t do this and traipse down the road of injecting some more shit into the atmosphere attempting to correct temporarily for the other shit we injected into the atmosphere for 300 years, I suspect it’s gonna be a rougher road and end in a very interesting fossil record thesis for some future species’ exo-anthropology dissertation.